Talk:Bill Duplissea (baseball)

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

delete, 27 April 2015, see discussion.
keep, 13 May 2008, see discussion.

A fact from Bill Duplissea (baseball) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 October 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Bill Duplissea has been said to have the "best eyes in baseball"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bill Duplissea (baseball).

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Baseball Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 11:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Bill Duplissea has been said to have the "best eyes in baseball"? Source: Dodd, Rustin (September 17, 2017). "The Royals remain the best at questioning umpires. Here's their secret". Kansas City Star. Retrieved 2023-09-27.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Rinaldo (1808)
- Comment: The edit history of this article is a bit funky. The article was deleted via an AfD in 2015, a fact that I was totally unaware of until I finished writing it. (I've since undeleted the old revisions.) The old article copy was unreferenced, has not been used in developing the new article, and never appeared on DYK, so I figure that + eight years fulfills the spirit (and letter?) of WP:DYKCRIT.

Created by The ed17 (talk). Self-nominated at 19:37, 27 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Bill Duplissea (baseball); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

I'll review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Looks good. I agree with your comment that this probably fulfills the spirit of the criteria. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additional source[edit]

[1] Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 21:41, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]