This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Almost this entire article needs cleanup. You can tell it's been written by him or a member of his team from the use of first name, political double speak and the fact it's 99% complimentary information PLUS there are almost no sources in the whole article. Note particularly the "constituency priorities" section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SquidSquad77 (talk • contribs) 19:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Have to agree with this; the article does not meet the NPOV ideal at all. Pcb21Pete 15:29, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looking a lot better now that "constituency priorities" has been removed but I still think the political career area needs some work --SquidSquad77 (talk) 01:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article has had a cleanup and I have removed a lot of unsourced content tonight. The article, in my view, is no longer unbalanced. I have therefore removed the "unbalanced" template at the top of the article. But if any editors have further concerns about WP:NPOV or balance, the template can be restored. Regards, Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}