Talk:Belford Roxo, Rio de Janeiro

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Geography of Brazil task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

IPA[edit]

In dialectal differences of Portuguese language found in Baixada Fluminense (and most of Rio de Janeiro state), Belford Roxo is certainly spell /ˈbɛwfɔh ˈχoʃu/, /ˈbɛwfɔ ˈχoʃu/ or /ˈbɛwfɔ ˈʁoʃu/, although /ʁ/ is very rare, often considered old-fashioned, and pronunciation of both 'r's (combination of /h/ and /χ/, first is pronounced more softly) is associated with formality and politeness. Lguipontes (talk) 09:02, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Belford Roxo, Rio de Janeiro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070109005631/http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/default.php to http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/default.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:36, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Population contradiction[edit]

There appears to be a huge discrepancy in the land area, population and population density numbers. 513,118 people in an area of 30,807sq mi results in 16/ sq mi, not 17,000 as the page says. Probably incorrect land area Oisinvg (talk) 03:51, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]