Talk:Beauty and the Beast (1991 film)/GA2

GA Review 2[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 14:59, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this soon.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:59, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the disambiguation page continues to have unresolved issues.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:46, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Noting unaddressed concerns from GA1 commentary by Bollyjeff (talk · contribs) at 13:27, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awards and nominations section has only (3) citations in the entire section.
- I only see 2 citations now.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:46, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Academy awards table looks different than the others.
- Still inconsistent.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:46, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also light on sources in Stage musical (1), which could use a See also: at the top, and Merchandise and spin-offs (0).
- Still has no citations in Merchandise and spin-offs section.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:46, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Still has a fully uncited paragraph in Stage musical section.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:46, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't The Little Mermaid linked?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:30, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"with two other awards for its music" at the xxth GG Awards'--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:30, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"total of six nominations" at the xxth Academy Awards--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:30, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Beauty and the Beast was the second film (following 1st film) produced using CAPS (Computer Animation Production System),--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Top Ten of the singles charts" is imprecise. Name the actual charts and link them.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is the point of "ahead of other famous films like #71 The Wizard of Oz, #80 To Kill a Mockingbird, and #94 Lawrence of Arabia"?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why doesn't AFI belong here?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In its YYYY IMAX re-release,--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Was it #1 at the box office for many weeks?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{mainarticle}}--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:10, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Link works such as The Houston Chronicle and New York Times as well as Actors Equity.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:10, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
received a Tony Award - Which one?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:10, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Should there be some more links to game articles?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:10, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

see comments above.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:10, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The 2nd caption is a bit odd. The first phrase is punctuated as a full sentence.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:13, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to put this article on hold. Please respond to each concern on the following line. I will ~~strike~~ as I fell comfortable that they have been resolved.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:15, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- I have notified the nominator that no progress has been made yet.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:50, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, i wasn't alerted to it being reviewed. Rusted AutoParts 15:31, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

You seem to have chosen not to respond to the concerns above.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:58, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am failing this nomination due to lack of activity.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:39, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]