Talk:Battle of Confey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The Annals says it was Ugaire, but the article on Niall Glúndub says "Niall's forces fought a large battle against a group of Northmen in the summer of 917, ending inconclusively", which might be Confey. Anyone know for certain? --AW 16:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks as the location of the battle is disputed, other than that there's no issue. The Onomasticon Goedlicum says:

C. Fuaitt; ¶ 1º. in the glen above Tech Moling, Lg. 209, Fm. ii. 590; ¶ 2º. in airiur Laigen, Au. i. 434, Cg. 34, Fm. ii. 588; ¶ 3º. a Norse fleet reached it; ¶ therefore 1st. nr St. Mullin's on the Barrow; ¶ 2nd. in the district of Lein.; ¶ airer = coast, border, district, mistaken by Od. for airther, east quarter; ¶ the battle fought there is mentioned also in Bb. 36 a, Fir. 427, K. 168 a, Ch. 188; ¶ I venture to place C. Fuaitt is in glinn uas Tigh Moling (of Fm. ii. 590) in Glynn, 1 m. N. of St. Mullin's, and 1 m. E. of the Barrow, to which the tide comes up, there Sitruc co n-a choblach landed and defeated the Leinstermen at C. F. in Glynn, over St. Mullin's; ¶ and again the Danes of C. F. plundered Kild.; ¶ but (?) as C. F. of Tech Moling is over 50 m. fr. Kild. this raid may have been fr. C. Fuait, now Confoy, al. Confey, nr Maynooth and Leixlip, which is only half as far away as St. Mullin's; ¶ O'D. and McCarthy identify it with Confey in Kild., nr Leixlip; ¶ Hennessy objects that airer meant coast, and Confey is 9 m. fr. the sea; ¶ but Airer Gaedel (Argyle) does not mean the cost of the Gael.

The New History of Ireland follows goes with Glynn. I couldn't find a mention anywhere else, but it is the same battle, whichever Cenn Fuaid/Fuait/Fuaitt it was fought at.

Minor nitpick: King Augaire's Irishised name is Augaire mac Ailella. The orthography on Kings of Leinster is still a bit dodgy. Cheers ! Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I can't get that link to work, but if you wanted to add something about the lcoation of the battle, please do! --AW 20:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Confey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Battle_of_Confey&oldid=1199627717"