Talk:Auster
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 3 external links on Auster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060502041748/http://www.austerclub.org:80/company_history/company_history.htm to http://www.austerclub.org/company_history/company_history.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061004151313/http://www.austerclub.org:80/type_list/auster_type_list.htm to http://www.austerclub.org/type_list/auster_type_list.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120502172646/http://www.museumvlbdeelen.nl/de-exposities/auster-restauratie to http://www.museumvlbdeelen.nl/de-exposities/auster-restauratie
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 10 May 2024[edit]
 | It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved. A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
– There are ten entries listed upon the Auster (disambiguation) page, including a list of six people under Auster (surname). When "Auster" is submitted to a search engine, most results go to Paul Auster, not to the airplane manufacturer from eighty years ago. The dab page form is similar to "Ford", which does not redirect to the Ford Motor Company or to famous people, such as Gerald Ford, Henry Ford or John Ford. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 19:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 12:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Seems eminently reasonable, yes, it's unlikely the average reader associates the term so strongly with the company. We could identify 22 clicks on the hatnote last month (WikiNav for Auster), which isn't nominally a lot compared to 1.2k incoming 389 outgoing, but that's mostly the organic traffic for the company that can be assumed to be shifting away quickly after the move. (Support) Interestingly, from there we see 19 clicks on Auster wind (WikiNav for the disambiguation page) which is listed last on the disambiguation page, yet the latter is also mentioned in the hatnote, where we don't detect any such thing. This for me is a further indication of suboptimal navigation layout, and we should experiment with this change even if we're unsure of it. --Joy (talk) 08:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per views[[1]]. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose. The aircraft manufacturer (second most popular by pageviews) is the primary topic by long-term significance, having manufactured the aircraft model Taylorcraft Auster (first most popular by pageviews). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)- @Shhhnotsoloud these are not actually the first and second most popular because the current phrasing of WP:NAMELIST relegates links to people to a separate list which obfuscates navigation; all-time page views for the first list show these two topics attracting the average interest of 82 and 46 readers per day, resp., while all-time page views for the second list show Paul Auster and Sophie Auster get 561 and 85 readers per day, respectively. Monthly view of these statistics shows these kinds of ratios are fairly reliably present through time, so this shouldn't be a fluke of WP:Recentism. The compendium of knowledge about topics named Auster shouldn't make it such a chore to navigate to this biography of a writer with obvious long-term significance and usage. --Joy (talk) 16:44, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ouch, yes, you're right @Joy:, see [2]. I think we're better off merging Auster (surname) into the disambiguation page (since there are only 6 entries, and nothing substantive about the name) and I support the move. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Shhhnotsoloud these are not actually the first and second most popular because the current phrasing of WP:NAMELIST relegates links to people to a separate list which obfuscates navigation; all-time page views for the first list show these two topics attracting the average interest of 82 and 46 readers per day, resp., while all-time page views for the second list show Paul Auster and Sophie Auster get 561 and 85 readers per day, respectively. Monthly view of these statistics shows these kinds of ratios are fairly reliably present through time, so this shouldn't be a fluke of WP:Recentism. The compendium of knowledge about topics named Auster shouldn't make it such a chore to navigate to this biography of a writer with obvious long-term significance and usage. --Joy (talk) 16:44, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. The aircraft manufacture is the clear primary topic by long-term significance, especially among the things known only as Auster. But if it is moved it should just be to Auster Aircraft; the "Limited" is unnecessary per WP:NCCORP. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Necrothesp according to the article, Auster made a significant plane in 1942 with this name, and changed its own name in 1946 to match that, dropping it in 1962. In total that's just 20 years. We ostensibly a lot of articles on various of the Auster plane models, but while some describe many hundreds of planes distributed widely around the world, the production numbers for numerous others are tiny, and for a lot of these it's not at all clear whether these were significant planes or is this enthusiastic editors collating information of less than stellar relevance based on rather specialist sources.
- Even if we weigh Paul Auster with a significantly smaller factor because it's just a surname, that article says he was active 1974–2023 which is 49 years, and lists numerous awards from a variety of locations. There's certainly also links to bad articles about less notable books, but a lot still seem to link to reviews in the general press, and mention adaptations in other media indicating continuing influence.
- There's going to be an obvious bias towards topics of general interest which naturally attract a more general coverage and audience, but still, if the coverage of a single person's work already plenty comparable, let alone the long tail, it's hard to escape the impression that the manufacturer's renown under this name can't really overshadow the renown of all other topics named Auster for the average English reader, who is neither an airplane enthusiast nor a book enthusiast. --Joy (talk) 14:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)