This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
I would like to know why changes adding facts and dates continue to be reverted back to the prior version which has to citations? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Storico (talk • contribs) 04:53, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn’t me that reverted, but I would guess it was because of the quality of the edits. This edit removed stub templates and categories. This removed categories and the references section. This blanked the page, as did this. This again removed categories and the references section. This removed a lot of information. This simply blanked the page. This again removed categories and the references section, and replaced existing wikified text with new text—useful in itself—which was deficient in formatting and lacking in internal links. This was similar—or identical—to the last, as were this and this.
It is hardly surprising that other editors seem to have concluded that the page was simply under attack from a determined vandal.Ian Spackman (talk) 10:02, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Are we sure that San Fantin was a Scuola Grande and not a Piccola Scuola? It does not appear in the usual lists of Scuole Grandi. --Macrakis (talk) 21:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
