Talk:Asgill Affair

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Asgill Affair article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

Military history: British / European / North America / United States / Early Modern / American Revolution Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force

United Kingdom C‑class Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

This picture[edit]

I see it's been discussed at Talk:Asgill_Affair/Archive_1#Artist’s_impression_of_the_drawing_of_lots,_based_on_archive_material, but my knee-jerk reaction is "WP:SPS fan-art." Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree. I'm sure a great deal of energy was expended upon the potential accuracy, etc. but it's still an educated guess with a lack of authoritative scholarship behind it, and it's just not a good image beyond that. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 14:06, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fwiw, theisleofthanetnews.com thought it was good enough to publish:[1]. Maybe a bit blog-ish[2]. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Was this really done to the sound of drumrolls? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:06, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]