A fact from Arthur Fell appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 December 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Just to explain two corrections I have just made, the law is that the two Judges trying an election petition must be in agreement for the petition to be upheld. Neither is senior to the other in the sense of having a 'casting vote'; they can be more senior in terms of service on the bench (Grantham had 11 years advantage on Channell - appointed 1886 compared to 1897) but it doesn't actually matter. Secondly, the report on O'Malley and Hardcastle's Reports on Election Petitions indicates on pages 198-199 that the Judges found that they did not have the ability to award costs given that they had disagreed. Grantham J was surprised to find this was the case, you may not be surprised to learn. The Times' discussion of the issues seems to have been a bit casual about these details but 5 O'M & H is the recognised trial report cited in subsequent trials by counsel and Judiciary. Sam Blacketer (talk) 18:39, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A stub article should be created on him. John Wortabet and his father William Thomson Wortabet were important doctors working at an Egyptian government medical college.
.svg){kind=small}
