Talk:Anttix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DES (talk) 19:41, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Please expand this - it's a stub, but it has promise.

Image needed[edit]

Because commons:File:Anttix Glasgow Main Stage 2013.JPG has been deleted and commons:Category:Anttix (vocalist) is empty.

No commercially reusable images of Anttix are found on either Flickr or Picasa. -Mardus (talk) 21:45, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References provided[edit]

The article was nominated for deletion lacking reliable references. I have now added further references to save it from an imminent deletion, but adding refimprove and notability notes. So the need is still there for more references from reliable sources. werldwayd (talk) 07:52, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough eligible sources this page should be deleted— Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.200.52.25 (talkcontribs)

Is there actually such a thing as the "official UK Club Chart"? I can only find references to "Dance Charts" and, if he did feature in these, they should be directly referenced. Deb (talk) 13:17, 20 December

Speedy deletion nomination of Anttix[edit]

A tag has been placed on Anttix, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unknown unsigned singer songwriter

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.

Declined speedy deletions
Declining speedy deletion. request done by an anonymous editor with no track record of editing in Wikipedia. Adequate references provided for notability of artist. werldwayd (talk) 15:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Please judge the article rather than my own record — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.29.50.105 (talk) 23:01, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Editor Malik Shabazz had also declined speedy deleting earlier by his edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anttix&diff=590365714&oldid=590365656 werldwayd (talk) 15:37, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editor weldwayd declined the speedy deletion as per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anttix&diff=590368449&oldid=590365889 werldwayd (talk) 20:49, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editor Hullaballoo Wolfowitz declined the speedy deletion a third time as per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anttix&diff=590430705&oldid=590426356 werldwayd (talk) 20:49, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{subst:adw|Anttix|Anttix (3rd nomination)}} 94.116.126.32 (talk) 10:17, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[edit]

Still unsigned independent unknown artist . No reliable sources.

Declining deletion request. This badly formatted and unsubstantiated edit for deletion was done by an anonymous editor with no track record of editing in Wikipedia. Despite claim of no reliable sources, adequate references have been provided for notability of artist. werldwayd (talk) 17:14, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This still doesn't mean he had a top 40 hit or ever will. Please do not vandalise the page by removing the deletion. Let the admins do their job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.142.2 (talk) 00:56, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article is self promotion and he is not a known celebrity or musical artist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.142.2 (talk) 00:58, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined again. Your anonymous account is simply a "one purpose account" probably involving "conflict of interest" (COI) matters. If this continues unabated, I am seriously considering requesting once and for all that only registered editors will be able to edit on this page. Anonymous account users should not in principal be involved in drastic measures like requesting deletion. We have adequate number of registered users who can notice and three of them have taken a look and have declined in the last one week. Enough campaigning just to rid Wikipedia of this specific article for personal agendas hiding behind various anonymous accounts of no edit record whatsoever, yet come in with deletion request of valid articles. In the span of one week we have had the following anonymous editors request deletions fro Anttix: 78.147.142.2 , 94.116.126.32 , 92.29.50.105 , 94.118.90.22 None of these accounts have established any track record of any useful editing whatsoever and openly revert reasoned edits of long established editors. werldwayd (talk) 01:00, 22 January 2014 (UTC) werldwayd (talk) 01:05, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined again. 94.118.3.140 (probably an image of the anonymous editor 94.118.90.22 in a continued campaign of no substance. In any case, first ever edit account, asking for deletion with no editing track record whatsoever. werldwayd (talk) 15:15, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Anttix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:02, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]