Talk:Anti-monarchism in Japan

Japan: History Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 09:13, May 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the History task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Articles for creation Stub‑class

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article was accepted on 15 February 2016 by reviewer Rcsprinter123 (talk · contribs).

Merge proposal[edit]

Anti-monarchism in Japan and Japanese dissidence during the early Shōwa period overlap greatly in scope both are small enough to be merged. Anti-monarchism in Japan seems to be the title which is more natural in modern English use, and is also more concise. I therefore recommend a merge into Anti-monarchism in Japan. Klbrain (talk) 22:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese dissidence during the early Shōwa period though awkwardly titled, would have to be the article into which Anti-monarchism in Japan is merged, if they are to be merged at all. All content of Anti-monarchism in Japan could be placed in the Japanese dissidence during the early Shōwa period. The same cannot be said of the reverse. Anti-Monarchism is merely one of the varieties of dissent described in Japanese dissidence during the early Shōwa period. (73.159.76.118 (talk) 16:53, 22 December 2017 (UTC))[reply]

With this edit Kirwanfan removed a merge template without discussion, although this might have been inadertently done as part an article clean-up. As the discussion had support and no objections, I've returned the template to encourage further discussion. Klbrain (talk) 11:13, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawing proposal; I note that the historical period covered by the two articles is different. Klbrain (talk) 07:36, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Second-hand usage of the adjective antagonistic[edit]

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/antagonistic

http://archive.fo/w7oLx

Usually antagonistic requires an αγών/ἀγών/competition.

The word you used is correct but not the first option.

In political texs the statistical usage of words suggests notions and narratives.

The communists acted unilaterally in Japan simply because they're not important.

They want a President elected by the diet, but a single legal political party.

If they want many parties including non-communist then they're socialists, not commies.

For sure there's retarded though.

Karl Marx never created a new political system in his writings.

Vladimir Lenin was a practical communist of a specific period.

Communism isn't open to all opinions and to a free society.

It's a single party-monarchy! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:8406:1600:E422:4991:94C6:160E (talk) 09:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]