Talk:Anthony Wilding/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR 22:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The lead was a bit disorganised and awkward to read, so I moved it around if that's OK

Same with the Early life section, it can be seen as too long to read comfortably so a split might be in order

"He missed the 1908 Olympics in London because of administrative bungling" - I don't understand this
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
No original research found.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Overall this is well written and comprehensive. The issues I brought up were very minor, so I'll pass this now as it meets the criteria. JAGUAR 22:37, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaguar: You wrote ""He missed the 1908 Olympics in London because of administrative bungling" - I don't understand this." I tried to more fully articulate the error as it was written in the source given. Is it easier to follow now? Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:14, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I understand it now. JAGUAR 23:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]