Talk:Anthony Ray Parker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Criminal accusations against his son[edit]

Please take some time to read WP:BLPCRIME (especially the first sentence) and WP:BLPNAME (specifically the 2nd paragraph) before you read the rest of this section. I'll wait.

Done? Good. The information being added regarding his son Joseph is 1) irrelevant to an encyclopedic understanding of Mr. Parker, and 2) there has been no conviction, and given that the son is relatively unknown, typical editorial practice is to wait until some kind of conviction is secured. Even if he had already been convicted of a crime, that information does not belong in this article, it belongs in an article about the scandal or about his son himself.

I have semi-protected the article to prevent re-insertion of the material under the authority of WP:BLPBAN. Editors who choose to edit this article, especially in relation to this particular material, should be aware that continuing to violate WP:BLP can lead to sanctions. —Darkwind (talk) 19:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A police investigation into his son is notable enough to be mentioned in one sentence in his article. Given that it is huge international news, then it is not undue to involve one sentence. And it doesn't contravene any BLP rules to mention that there is a police investigation.Avaya1 (talk) 01:34, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If this is "huge international news", then there should be more than one RS mentioning this. Otherwise this is a BLP violation. Two kinds of pork (talk) 02:21, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is absolutely no suggestion that the subject of this article was in any way, shape or form involved in his son's situation. Attaching guilt by association is simply and completely right out. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 22:57, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know whether or not it is appropriate to include the rape scandal his son has been embroiled in in New Zealand in this article. But some of the diminishing comments here are disturbing. let's not downplay the fact that this has been a major on-going scandal in New Zealand, making repeat headlines in all mainstream NZ news sources for several years now. It's been discussed in the national parliament and lead to debate and inquiries about rape culture and the way rape crimes are dealt with by the New Zealand Police. His son is a prominent figure in New Zealand as a result of this. 121.73.7.84 (talk) 06:43, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioning it is his son is of course notable for inclusion in the article, by every norm of Wikipedia. The majority of media attention is related to this. There is no "guilt by association" to the subject of the article, beyond this family relationship.Avaya1 (talk) 04:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anthony Ray Parker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]