This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article was created or improved during the Plants & Gardens edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in April 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
A fact from Anne Maria Barkly appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 May 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kingsif (talk) 11:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Created by Victuallers (talk). Self-nominated at 13:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]
@Victuallers, sorry you had to wait for a while on this. New when nominated, 2300+ bytes of prose, hooks cited (with one caveat to follow), QPQ done, some issues with the image. The hook issue is: Melbourne says the city was founded on 30 August 1835. Anne Maria Barkly says she was born in 1837. So, if those two dates are correct, how could she be older than the city? I think alt0 is the best, followed by alt2 (for which I AGF the offline source), so I'm not too concerned about alt1. I am a bit concerned about the image, however. It's sourced from a Pinterest page, which directs the reader to this page for an exhibition at the National Library of Australia. I can't find the image on that page. Of course, if it was produced in 1860, it is presumably in the public domain, but I'd like clearer licensing information if possible. Also, the lede is a bit confusing: do you mean that she had expertise in/published widely on the flora of Mauritius and South Africa? AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 20:19, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@AleatoryPonderings: Thanks for the review. I have withdrawn Alt1. Not sure what you want to do with the image. As you say it was produced in 1860, then what more information would convince you and of what? Its likely anonymous now. Surely all we need to know is whether it has a free license, anything else is just a bonus. Victuallers (talk) 19:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My concern re: the image was simply that it was sourced from Pinterest and therefore the provenance was initially unclear. Happily, though, on a second look, PDF page 47 of this PDF (exhibit catalogue for the NLA exhibit) has a low-res version of this drawing, which is enough for me to clarify the date of creation. I will leave it to the promoter to determine whether the exhibit catalogue source is sufficient to verify a free licence for the high-res image. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 19:34, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@AleatoryPonderings: The source you supplied featured new information that although the design was for her, she in fact, chose a different dress so I had to add that extra info to the article and tweak Alt0 - can you confirm the change?
@Victuallers: The sources verify the new alt0, but the bit about "years before" reads oddly to me. (To my ear, it suggests some kind of connection between the two?) Up to you, but I might prefer alt0a: