Talk:Anglo-Italian Cup

Anglo-Italian Cup has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 2, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
September 16, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 5, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in the initial Anglo-Italian Cup football tournaments, one point was awarded for every goal scored?

Current status: Good article

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: England / Italy Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Italian football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

(No subject)[edit]

Please not that the Runner-Up in the 1973 final of the Anglo-Italian Cup was not Fiorentina but AS Roma !!!

Please check out the official history video of Newcastle United as there are tv black & white images of the final winning game (0-2 score at the Olimpic Stadium in Rome against AS Roma) !!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.193.172.200 (talk • contribs) 08:53, January 4, 2006.

According to [1] the final was definitely between Fiorentina and Newcastle; however, Newcastle did beat Roma 2-0 in the group stages of the competition, which is probably the match you saw on the video. Qwghlm 11:26, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Anglo-Italian Cup. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Will start the review tomorrow. Pmlineditor Talk 16:33, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

3 items? Expand this please. And we need sources for it.
Why is "Alitalia Challenge Cup", "Talbot Challenge Cup" and "Gigi Peronace Memorial" bolded?
Club's founder needs article.

History[edit]

"The Football League Cup was changed in 1967 so the winner would be awarded a place in the Inter-Cities Fairs Cup." - How was it changed?
However, when Queens Park Rangers won the final that year they were in the Third Division and, at that time, UEFA did not allow third-tier teams to compete in the Inter-Cities Fairs Cup - needs punctuations

Fix these first. I'll check the rest and post tomorrow (In case I forget, ping me on my talk page). The article looks good to me; it is likely that it'll pass. :) Pmlineditor Talk 15:38, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't got much time today; will finish tomorrow. Pmlineditor Talk 15:44, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grouped replies

Lead

I don't understand what you mean by "3 items?". However per Wikipedia:Lead_section#Length one paragraph is suitable for the lead as this article's length (~6200 characters) is well under 15000 characters. I'll try and add in another sentence perhaps. Additionally, inline citations in lead are not required per WP:LEADCITE as it is all sourced in the body of the article.

Not the lead; the infobox. Pmlineditor Talk 15:38, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An infobox is part of the lead, and as such is covered under leadcite. As for the "three items" part, the infobox was the only part of this article that I didn't add. Tell me if you want it removed completely. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 16:07, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ChrisTheDude has expanded the infobox so hopefully it is fine now. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 22:01, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

These are it's other names. From WP:BOLDTITLE: If the subject of the page has a common abbreviation or more than one name, the abbreviation (in parentheses) and each additional name should be in boldface on its first appearance.
That has never been a requirement, and isn't in FAs either. However, I'll endeavour to create one, but it likely won't be until the weekend.

An article on this person is coming along in my sandbox, ~~however I rather busy at the moment and probably won't get it into mainspace this week.~~ Rambo's Revenge (talk) 22:01, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gigi Peronace

History

It was changed so that "the winner would be awarded a place in the Inter-Cities Fairs Cup" because before 1967 they didn't, I'll try and clarify this.

Done, Rambo's Revenge (talk) 22:01, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done, Rambo's Revenge (talk) 22:01, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rambo's Revenge (talk) 22:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I find the fact that the text size is only 17K a bit concerning. Can you possibly add 1-2K text somewhere? Regards, Pmlineditor Talk 15:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checking the page, these are the main issues I find. They should be easy to fix, so ping me when you have done them. I'll give a look and will probably promote it. Pmlineditor Talk 15:58, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Anglo-Italian Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Anglo-Italian Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:07, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]