Talk:Amy Brown (royal mistress)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Very POV article[edit]

This article is totally POV. No historic evidence can prove that Amy Brown was not a mere mistress of Duke of Berry. It is true that there was an important link between the prince and Amy but it is impossible to affirm that they married. So this article need to be rewritten. 82.237.218.242 (talk) 17:14, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you think the article needs to be rewritten, then go ahead and make the necessary changes; but don't forget to include reliable sources!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:32, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what to think about your commentary: you used a reference that you didn't read completely (see the third note, on page 245 of David Skuy's book, where it is written "Definitive proof of the marriage has never been found. Castelot 435-44; Brown 4-5") and then you tell me to use "reliable sources". As we say in French: "c'est un peu fort de café"!!!!

This article must be renamed "Amy Brown (royal mistress)": it is a question of reliability! (ps. sorry for my horrible English) 82.237.218.242 (talk) 10:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Betty-la-fea (talk) 08:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that was a quick move Betty-la-fea. Seeing as just one person proposed the change shouldn't you have waited a wee bit longer to get more input from other editors before jumping the gun?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 17:07, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but even David Skuy recognizes nothing proves she was Berry's wife. So I think your title was not adapted. Betty-la-fea (talk) 11:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I still think there should have been more discussion before you made the move.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Don't forget to include reliable sources!" Betty-la-fea (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell is that comment supposed to mean? I've created over 300 articles for the project, so I "think" I know a thing or two about reliable sources. Now for the weather...--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 17:36, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

translate please into spanish,thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.16.164.10 (talk) 11:15, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]