Talk:Amos Kenan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 21:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfC and discussion[edit]

I'm not sure if it's possible to start an RfC on this article in another talk page (trying now), but in any case, I've started a relevant discussion about Amos Keinan at WT:ISRAEL#Amos Ke(i)nan. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 18:54, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I said before, I don't have any objection to moving this article if there's consensus for it. -- Nudve (talk) 19:46, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Romanized spelling of surname[edit]

For the record, his listing in the U.S. Library of Congress catalog is spelled Kenan, and Keinan Amos redirects to that primary listing. -- Deborahjay (talk) 17:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like Haaretz plagiarized this article[edit]

Compare the June 21 version and the Haaretz obituary. Obviously closely parallel, a number of identical phrases ("...where he worked as a sculptor and published several plays. Pierre Alechinsky illustrated two of his books and Maurice Bejart adapted his plays...").Prezbo (talk) 18:45, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may have a point, although I don't think it's plagiarism per se. -- Nudve (talk) 05:46, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amos Kenan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Amos Kenan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:11, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Amos Kenan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:44, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uri Avnery as a source[edit]

This is an excellent source. Uri Avnery knew everyone who was 'anybody' from all Prime Ministers downwards in Israel from 1948 until his recent death. He was a journalist of distinction, a parliamentarian, and writes with personal knowledge of Kenan, about whom we have very few good sources. There is no reason why the deprecation of CounterPunch, where he chose to occasionally publish his pieces, should deprecate by some contagion the quality of the source here.Nishidani (talk) 21:48, 30 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

There is, and many people have explained it to you in the course of the present RFC. You don't understand deprecation, evidently because you don't want to - David Gerard (talk) 22:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nishidani's analysis is correct and convincing. It is very clear that removal of Avnery's obituary weakens the article. The most official explanation of deprecation is at WP:RSDEPRECATED, which begins "A small number of sources are deprecated on Wikipedia. That means they should not be used, unless there is a specific consensus to do so." (my emphasis). So even if deprecation is prima facie evidence of unreliability, once the unreliability is challenged one must ask whether there is a "specific consensus" (which means a consensus on how to handle this particular case). Currently there are two specific arguments for inclusion and no specific argument for exclusion. Zerotalk 05:12, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
'You don't understand deprecation, evidently because you don't want to.' From a policy specialist, this inference about my motives violates WP:AGF, aside from ignoring the small print at WP:RSDEPRECATED, as pointed out to you above. I suggest you reflect on your own words: 'you don't want to . . understand deprecation.' Nishidani (talk) 11:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The source is deprecated, and clearly fails WP:UNDUE for being in a deprecated source. That you like the source doesn't change that - David Gerard (talk) 12:21, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Citing now WP:Undue, you avoid the question directly posed: deprecation policy admits exceptions. I challenged your excision, you kept reverting; another editor also disagreed with you. You asked me to fulfill WP:Burden, and duly I answered why Avnery was appropriate. You didn't reply but persisted in reverting, ignoring the talk page and then throwing in another (irrelevant) policy. It has got nothing to do with whether I 'like' the source. That itself is ambiguous: the source can be 'Counterpunch' or it can be Uri Avnery. You take the source as Counterpunch, I and Zero as Avnery. If you are removing like a bot Counterpunch articles sight unseen, by deliberately ignoring the talk page and a consensus there, you are being disruptive. This is, in my view, a behavioural problem, - refusal to allow exceptions when exceptions are allowed- and I'm not the problem.Nishidani (talk) 13:51, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amos_Kenan&oldid=1207947159"