Talk:Amatsukami and Kunitsukami

Japan: Mythology / Shinto Mid‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 10:21, May 25, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This redirect is supported by the Mythology task force.

This redirect is supported by the Shinto task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Mythology

This redirect is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles

Well...[edit]

...Amatsugami are also called Tenjin, and Kunitokotsujin are called Chigi (地祇).[6]Some people believe that the names "Tenjin Chigi (天神地祇)" and "Jingi (神祇)" are derived from the Chinese classics, but the term "Jingi (神祇)" is not used in the Chinese classics.[7]、The ...

It's cute that you have a native source for that claim but it's not actually true. 地祇 is absolutely a classical Chinese term. — LlywelynII 15:38, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's cute that you think sounding like a douchebag is cool, or in any way justified. Now, since the kanji 神祇 and 地祇 are different, is it actually the same term? If it is, add your source and clarification or I'm sure the primary editor will take it into account and thank you for your contribution. Boneyard90 (talk) 18:34, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]