Talk:Almas Tower

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Arab Emirates: Dubai Mid‑importance

	United Arab Emirates portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Arab Emirates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Arab Emirates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United Arab EmiratesWikipedia:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesTemplate:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesUnited Arab Emirates articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Dubai (assessed as Mid-importance).

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attkins[edit]

Attkins didn't design the JLT, they barely have 3 projects out of over 100 main contracts!!! --Maha Odeh (talk) 11:04, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat says this building was completed in 2008.[edit]

They awarded it 2nd place on a list for "tallest buildings completed in 2008". http://www.ctbuh.org/HighRiseInfo/TallestDatabase/TallestCompletedEachYear/TallestCompletedin2008/tabid/790/language/en-US/Default.aspx

-MattCHarris —Preceding unsigned comment added by MattCHarris (talk • contribs) 14:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is odd because the main picture on the article shows that it is not fully clad - which is one of the criteria to be listed as being completed by CBTUH. It was topped out in 2008, but that was it. I am not sure if it is open or partially open. - Erebus555 (talk) 20:56, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In fact the tower was partially opened for business on 15 November 2008 when the Dubai Multi commodities Centre moved in (check the footnotes in the article). It's still not fully clad yet, so apparently being "open for business" is the most important criterion in CBTUH's view. Orionist (talk) 15:29, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Almas Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:12, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]