Talk:Alexei Tammet-Romanov
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Inappropriate tone[edit]
I added an inappropriate-tone tag because this reads more like, say, an interest article in the Sunday paper than how a WP article should read -- e.g., words like "unfortunately" and overuse of the word "claim". Any revisions would be appreciated.
--Slyguy 16:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- The tone is completely appropriate. Claims not conserting with fact have to be pointed out as such. If you have suggestions on alternative wording that still manages to convey the fact the his claims are absurd, please share them. - Nunh-huh 04:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. Also, the authors apparently no credentials or sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mvise4 (talk • contribs) 19:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
The inappropriate tone would be courtesy of people from the Alexander Palace webpage who have an axe to grind with John Kendrick.
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alexei Tammet-Romanov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091012020300/http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2009/1008/2? to http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2009/1008/2?
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 8 October 2016 (UTC)