Talk:Al Karam Secondary School
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Jamia al-karam logo.PNG[edit]
Image:Jamia al-karam logo.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
New edits[edit]
I am trying to improve the article and one respected editor is saying that my edits were partisan but How?
The institute is divided into two school one is Jamia for Islamic education and another is providing secular education to students. Adding recent updates about school result and its new girls wing ,making separate heading can't be partisan or biased? 1 Motto 2 Jamia Al Karam 3 Jamia Al Karam School 4 Legacy 5 Inauguration of World Association for Al-Azhar Graduates (WAAG) at Jamia Al Karam 6 Opening of Girls wing Please explain what looked biased to you before reverting such large content that too validly sourced.ScholarM (talk) 18:11, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Content/quality[edit]
This page gives no useful information about the school. Someone who had a connection with it needs to come on here and make some SIGNIFICANT changes. It is not a worthwhile article at the moment. Nobody wants its future to be questioned. This would be bad for the project. At the moment, however, it is just not worth the time. -Sb2001 (talk) 18:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)