This article is within the scope of WikiProject Berbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Berbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BerbersWikipedia:WikiProject BerbersTemplate:WikiProject BerbersBerbers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This certainly seems to fail WP:NOTABILITY and WP:NOT a dictionary. Is there some historical background or importance missing, aside from its tentative connection to Guinea's etymology (which would likewise fail, since that information is already given in a sentence at the appropriate articles)? — LlywelynII 16:02, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to me this article is completely included in Guinea (region), which has much more information, and references. Is there any reason to retain it, except as a redirect, or a link in the disambiguation page? Wwheaton (talk) 02:46, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]