Talk:ASPIDER

This page was proposed for deletion by Barkeep49 (talk · contribs) in the past with the comment:
Does not appear to be notable. Appears to be recreation of ASPIDER Solutions which was AfD deleted.
It was contested by Kvng (talk · contribs) on 2018-05-15 with the comment:
Article has been improved since PROD. Additional coverage since last deletion attempt in 2008.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... I had to create the article in order to add the logo. I am adding content as fast as I can and have added a lot of citations to show authenticity and importance in the industry.

David

And as I said you should have spent less time on the logo and more time on sourcing.Slatersteven (talk) 16:10, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks... I have now added sourcing references David Traynor (talk) 17:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)davidtraynor[reply]