Talk:50th Operations Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reinforcement of NATO[edit]

The following text was removed from the article on 14 January 2015:

The group was reactivated following Secretary of State John Foster Dulles' promise to provide NATO with four additional tactical fighter wings to increase its defenses against the Soviet Union due to the outbreak of the Cold War.[1]

The cited reference does not support the statement. If a reliable source for this can be found, it could be restored in modified form. If this promise was made, it would originally have influenced a plan to move the 140th Wing. The activation of the 50th was a change in name only. By 1953, replacements and reassignments had made guard units indistinguishable from regular and activated reserve units in terms of their personnel. The 50th was activated when the 140th completed 18 months on active duty, which, I believe, was a statutory limit on the length of time National Guard units could serve on active duty. --Lineagegeek (talk) 17:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An unreferenced statement "This [Fox Able 20] marked the first mass flight of an entire F-86 fighter bomber group from the United States to continental Europe." I can not find any source for this. There had been 19 previous deployments, and the flight (presumably along the northern route since the F-86F did not have an air refueling capability) is not particularly remarkable since SAC fighters were already making non stop flights across the Atlantic as early as 1950. --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Saunders, Randy (October 26, 2006). "From Master of the Sky to Master of Space: 50th FW moves to USAFE, active duty". The Satellite Flyer. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 50th Operations Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:51, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:28, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Emblem[edit]

See Talk:50th Space Wing for a discussion of the emblem used when the group was a fighter-bomber unit. --Lineagegeek (talk) 12:38, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 50th Operations Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]