Talk:29th Golden Raspberry Awards/Archive 1

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Note

Category:FL-Class film awards articles. Cirt (talk) 03:13, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Edits by user Defender miz

Defender miz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Edits by this user have recently degraded the quality of this Featured List quality status page.

Please do not add these edits back again.

Please, instead discuss here on the talk page.

Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 13:49, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Look at all the other pages for the Golden Raspberry Awards. They all have their winners marked in bold. Why is it okay in every other Golden Raspberry Awards page except for this one? Please explain this to me as simply as possible. That is all I am asking. Defender miz (talk) 18:03, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Because this is the only page of all of those that went through WP:FLC and they said it should have the bold removed. — Cirt (talk) 19:29, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Defender, per MOS:BOLD, we only use bold formatting in "a few special cases" such as "table headers and captions" (which is done here) and not beyond that. So the other pages may need to be updated to follow the guidelines. Erik (talk | contribs) 19:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Yes, agree with Erik, above. The other pages are deficient. This one should be the model, for the other pages. — Cirt (talk) 19:40, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Okay man, I understand. Listen, no real hard feelings, right Cirt? Defender miz (talk) 22:01, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in the talk page discussion and reading the advice from myself and from Erik (talk · contribs), above. Much appreciated. — Cirt (talk) 02:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

FLC formatting

Let's please keep formatting as per WP:FLC, thank you, — Cirt (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Shouldn't Mark Wahlberg be after Al Pacino?

That seems to be more alphabetically correct. Defender miz (talk) 17:43, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Let's please leave it as the version approved from the WP:FL quality process, thanks. — Cirt (talk) 17:44, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Okay, just saying its going to look weird to some people. Defender miz (talk) 17:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Alright, I'm okay with that, thanks. — Cirt (talk) 17:48, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Update: Done, I've reordered it, please see diff, thank you, — Cirt (talk) 19:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, Cirt. Defender miz (talk) 23:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

You're most welcome, — Cirt (talk) 00:00, 21 February 2014 (UTC)