This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Handball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Handball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HandballWikipedia:WikiProject HandballTemplate:WikiProject HandballHandball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Where is source that Spain qualified as 2018 champion? Previoulsy Euro champion played qualification. --213.248.38.6 (talk) 13:47, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And previously we never had a Euro with 24 teams. So obviously there can be something new here.--Anaxagoras13 (talk) 18:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That source is just wrong. CZE vs CRO is irrelevant, and the margin of victory for BLR vs AUT too. What Math geniuses at "Der Westen".--Anaxagoras13 (talk) 18:34, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There were many sources in german, tbh. I agree CZE/CRO and BLR/AUT was not needed. Just BLR and ESP, but it's over now anyways. Kante4 (talk) 18:40, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And 6 goals + for BLR vs Spain too, ESP and GER would have had a +1 goal diff. in the 3-way-tie, a 7 or 8 goal victory was needed, never trust a journalist :-)--Anaxagoras13 (talk) 18:46, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Should have picked another one, there were many to choose from. ;) Kante4 (talk) 18:49, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]