Talk:2018 Kansas gubernatorial election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kansas gubernatorial election, 2018. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:49, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two-way poll[edit]

It's a hypothetical, but I can't find further details about this two-way poll (dates, sample size, pollster). Leaving this here as a reminder to check back later. Mélencron (talk) 18:46, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox[edit]

What is our rationale for excluding Kloos and Caldwell while including Orman in the infobox?SecretName101 (talk) 03:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orman's clearly a major candidate to any casual observer of the race and he's polling above 5%. Mélencron (talk) 13:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
With experience from other pages like this, they don't usually include the libertarian nominee unless that party won at least 5% last time, which they did not. So the Libertarian candidate Caldwell should come down. The independent is consistently polling above 5, and even 10%- so he should stay.VisaBlack (talk) 23:42, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:53, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Results[edit]

The results include a reference to results from Iowa. Reference 141. Browner4ever (talk) 18:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]