Talk:2010 in art

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Inclusion[edit]

What are the criteria for including an event or exhibition? This is a rather skimpy list. It would hardly give a reader a survey of what has happened this year. It seems arbitrary. Warrenking (talk) 20:34, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Common sense has to rule - at any given moment there are thousands of exhibitions worldwide each year, every year. If one is listed then everyone wants a listing. Consequently only important precedent setting, important news-making events, milestones in the art world should be included. The first Whitney Biennial not every Whitney Biennial, etc...Modernist (talk) 20:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough answer. It's still a bit disappointing that auction results make up for so much of it. This doesn't give a sense of what the zeitgeist of the time was or is. 2010 seems to be a year with as much excess as any of the previous years, but there was also lots of discussion challenging the art market as a measure of value and asking questions about ethics. Tino Sehgal's show at the Guggenheim may be a kind of precedent. However, I'd have to give more though to other kind of precedents. Warrenking (talk) 21:10, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Bruce High Quality Foundation perhaps? Warrenking (talk) 21:15, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Deitch becomes director of MOCA? Seems to have been quite the controversy there. Also, it was the first time a former dealer was appointed as a museum director. Warrenking (talk) 21:15, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Warren - if you have very strong positive notions about a particular event; add it; if there are objections then consensus will determine the outcome. I would like to not include auction results except those really exceptional instances as the recent Picasso and Giacometti sale or the 140 million dollar Pollock, or something like the old Robert Scull auction or the late 80s Van Gogh sale to the Japanese collector etc...Modernist (talk) 22:25, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 00:46, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010 in art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2010 in art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2010_in_art&oldid=1196579130"