Talk:2004–05 New Zealand Football Championship

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NZFC 2004/05 - Canterbury played extra home game (Pt.1)[edit]

Quote: Originally Posted by henryo Did anyone noticed that Canterbury United has actually played 12 home games in 2004/05 season? The same is also confirmed at RSSSF.com.

Is this a mistake? Was thinking that each team should play up to a max. of 11 games at home during a 21-game season.

Have emailed NZFC.CO.NZ since last year but no firm reply yet, although it was mentioned that "they did play Auckland in Nelson that year which would have been counted as a home game for Canterbury (in Round 17 which they lost 0-3)".

Can anyone help?

NZFC 2004/05 - Canterbury played extra home game (Pt.2)[edit]

At the end of 2007/08 (4th season), where every team should have played equal number (42) of Home/Away games, Canterbury will again play 1 more home game than others, while Waikato play 1 less.

It was the same case at the end of 2005/06 (2nd season), where all else played 21 Home/Away, Canterbury played 22 while Waikato played just 20 at Home.

Even if their game with Auckland is switched, Waikato would have still played 1 less Home Game , while Auckland played 1 more instead.

So I guess there're more errors in the 2004/05 fixtures, or even 2005/06?


Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 11:11, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


New Zealand Football Championship 2004–052004–05 New Zealand Football Championship — All league name start with year first rather than name of the league first, article should be moved to 2004–05 New Zealand Football Championship to be the same. JaumeBG 08:35, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Agreed. This is standard procedure in sports events, and should be moved. Sellyminime (talk) 09:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.