Category talk:Monarchs of the United Kingdom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured topic candidateThis article is part of a former featured topic candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed.
Category milestones
DateProcessResult
January 18, 2007Featured topic candidateNot promoted

Protestant?[edit]

The Anglican Communion (including Church of England) does not call itself protestant, but reformed catholic. Shouldn't they be under "Anglican Monarchs" nor "Protestant Monarchs"? --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 22:58, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Depopulate?[edit]

Per [1] @Marcocapelle:

Should this category be depopulated? (Likewise Category:British monarchs and Category:English monarchs)

Strictly applying OVERCAT to remove all pages from these because they're in the per-century subcategories would be a bad change. It would seriously devalue these overall categories as a listing of all such monarchs, and as a navigational feature. It is not common knowledge such that we can simply assume it for our readers to known the century to which Henry IV belonged.

There is also a concern from WP:PERFCAT, which is regularly cited to delete categorisation for groups such as "Cold War aircraft". Now I wouldn't go that far, but Category:English monarchs is very strongly defining in a way that "British monarchs of the 11th century" is much less so.

OVERCAT is a regular source of damaging edits to the overall performance of the encyclopedia, in the pursuit of a pointless dogmatism. We shouldn't make that mistake yet again. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • The term "depopulation" is wrong here. This is diffusion. The subcategories remain part of the tree. This is standard categorization practice. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]