Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alberta/Assessment
Wikiproject Alberta
Assesment: Statistics - Work list - Assessment log
Alberta articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
FA | 2 | 10 | 8 | 20 | |||
FL | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | |||
GA | 1 | 5 | 21 | 60 | 87 | ||
B | 4 | 20 | 88 | 169 | 281 | ||
C | 3 | 12 | 104 | 503 | 622 | ||
Start | 11 | 605 | 4,211 | 4,827 | |||
Stub | 190 | 4,347 | 4,537 | ||||
List | 1 | 3 | 62 | 176 | 1 | 1 | 244 |
Category | 1,603 | 1,603 | |||||
Disambig | 52 | 52 | |||||
File | 107 | 107 | |||||
Project | 10 | 10 | |||||
Redirect | 1 | 3,755 | 3,756 | ||||
Template | 1,562 | 1,562 | |||||
Other | 2 | 2 | |||||
Assessed | 9 | 55 | 1,083 | 9,479 | 7,092 | 1 | 17,719 |
Unassessed | 4 | 4 | |||||
Total | 9 | 55 | 1,083 | 9,479 | 7,096 | 1 | 17,723 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 54,862 | Ω = 5.29 |
Requested assessments[edit]
- Henry Norwest I expanded the article a fair bit, so I'd appreciate a re-assessment because I do not think that it is a stub anymore. CplKlinger (talk) 02:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Empty table[edit]
Your assessment table looks empty now because the assessment categories have been moved from "X-Class WikiProject Alberta articles" to just "X-Class Alberta articles". The table will fill back up on its own once the job queue and bots catch up to the change. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 19:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)