Wikipedia talk:User RFC reform

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This straw poll is pointless, since it only proves RFC process to be impopular (which we already knew, see WP:AAP) and does not propose a solution other than vagueness or scrapping it entirely. Please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Enforcement for a constructive proposal that addresses several concerns given in AAP. >Radiant< 13:01, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Enforcement is one issue, but the problems with RFC go beyond this. Incivility, in particular, is a serious concern with many RFCs that I have witnessed. While WP:RFC/E is a proposal that deserves to be seriously considered, this straw poll still serves a useful purpose. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 17:19, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BZZT[edit]

Before RFC come things like mediation cabal and third opinion After RFC comes advocacy, mediation committee or more mediation cabal after mediation committee comes arbitration committee.

Please don't overload the arbitration committee, they are already overstressed. Thank you. Kim Bruning 14:12, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:User_RFC_reform&oldid=1075366806"