Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Redeye Sailboat

Redeye Sailboat[edit]

Reason: This is a high EV image.
Articles this image appears in: RedEye
Advertising
Sailboat
Creator: TonyTheTiger

Support as nominator --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose Redeye is a magazine, how is their logo on a boat even remotely enough EV to justify the requirements of a VPC for any of those articles? — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 00:34, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Also to add, this is probably a copyright violation of their logo using it here. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 00:42, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- As far as the copyright of the logo goes. I dont think it gets any copyright. Its a very simple logo consisting of text and simple geometric shapes. See Template:PD-textlogo for more details. --JovianEye (talk) 03:34, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - It's close to the threshold of originality... — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 03:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - Even if it does surpass the threshold of originality (which I don't believe it does), it falls under de minimis and is thus not a copyright violation. Juliancolton (talk) 00:52, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      - Again I'd say it would be very marginally close to falling under de minimis, but irregardless it holds virtually zero EV in all of it's uses. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 01:09, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - the boat's not at her best, (headsail furled and a reef in the main), so I don't see the EV as being quite there. - Bilby (talk) 05:23, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not enough EV for any of these articles. --Elekhh (talk) 01:16, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose See the all the comments above. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 16:38, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Jujutacular ^talk 14:04, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]