Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 June 15

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< June 14 June 16 >

June 15[edit]

Template:MJ the Musical[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a need for a navigation box to identify the songs used in a musical, especially since nearly all of them are already in {{Michael Jackson songs}}. If there were more articles directly related to the musical, it could be of some use. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mitch Hedberg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Izno (talk) 00:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Four links to articles. Already linked on his mainspace article. Fails NENAN. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 21:18, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. ✗plicit 23:52, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, connects 5 articles. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:24, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    We don't consider the title generally speaking --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:32, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Clearly you should consider the title, since that's the most important link in the navbox. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:03, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The main article is important. But the body is where you get most of the connection to said title link. They do connect with the main subject, but if one more link in the body is added, then the navbox in my view passes the rule of thumb of NENAN which we rely on when making such nominations because there is no set policy at the moment. Even though, there should be. And all links are already featured on the main article. The navbox just duplicates the same list of links. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:19, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, the rule of thumb essay. Since this is not policy, so I will stay with keep. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:55, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep, provides direct navigation between the film and the albums. none of the linked articles have more than one navbox, so no problem with navbox creep. Frietjes (talk) 15:17, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Padlock list[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-WP-space-use template. No objection to subpaging, but pretty sure I favor a subst. Izno (talk) 18:02, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tuvalu A-Division (women)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and all links redirected to the main article, Tuvalu A-Division (women), after a May 31 Afd. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:47, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TVQ[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 June 22. ✗plicit 23:48, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SP color[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:59, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/São Paulo Metro. Gonnym (talk) 08:27, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SITEUR color[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:59, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Guadalajara light rail system. Gonnym (talk) 08:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CPTM color[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:58, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/São Paulo Metropolitan Trains. Gonnym (talk) 08:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Astram Line style[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:01, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Hiroshima Rapid Transit. Gonnym (talk) 08:14, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Amsterdam Tram color[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Amsterdam Tram REEDriler (talk) 00:13, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The templates are used by a number of articles. Why do you want to delete them? Have you replaced them in the articles where they are used? TheTrolleyPole (talk) 02:36, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Superseded, no transclusions, no future use. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:02, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 08:34, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_June_15&oldid=1095549159"