Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 June 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< June 16 June 18 >

June 17[edit]

Template:Gambian parliamentary election, 2012[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 16:34, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information on the elections is already featured on the respective articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:59, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Results tables in the articles are equally or more detailed. Number 57 22:23, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

B-Line Templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 03:56, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List local train stops in British Columbia, Canada. The only links are to major stations and to express lines. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's only notable if the local stops are notable as in the templates for the MTA train or bus routes in New York City. These don't list notable locations throughout. Also, 95 and 96 are unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:06, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete at the minimum 95 B-Line and 96 B-Line as unused. Gonnym (talk) 10:28, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all Every single one of these is either unused or single-use. The purpose of the template namespace, per Wikipedia:Template namespace, is to store [...] Wiki markup intended for inclusion on multiple pages and unused or single-use templates fundamentally fail that purpose. The single-use ones should be substituted before deletion. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:48, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zambian parliamentary election, 2011[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 16:34, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both templates are redundant as the 2011 Zambian general election article already uses different tables for the presidential and parliamentary election results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:43, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Results tables in the article is more detailed. Number 57 20:31, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eastern Cape South Africa Elections[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 16:36, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Eastern Cape provincial elections are featured on the respective South African general elections articles using a different table for the election results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Unnecessary duplicates. Number 57 20:32, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Djibouti Elections[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 16:36, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All the information on these templates is already featured on the mainspaces. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:17, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Results tables in the article are equally or more detailed. Number 57 20:31, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Republic of the Congo parliamentary election, 2007[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 16:36, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both unused and the information on the templates is featured on the respective articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:42, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Unnecessary duplicates. Number 57 20:30, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Democratic Republic of Congo Elections[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 16:37, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All the information is already on the respective mainspace. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:36, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The results tables in the articles are more detailed (the only additional detail in the parliamentary template is % of seats, which is not typically used). Number 57 20:29, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Calgary municipal elections (1800s)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 17:13, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These templates each only have 1 article transclusion (And some are not used at all), with significant length titles making it a barrier to edit some of these articles (Especially with the ward specific templates: Example) if any of the data / references would need to be altered / updated. These templates should be substituted and deleted as they have no benefit. Terasail[✉️] 14:59, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete. Election data should only ever be on one page, which is the relevant election one so there is no reason to ever create these in the first place. Hopefully soon these will all be converted and new ones stop being created. Gonnym (talk) 15:09, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Paypal info 0778172254[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. The template has been nominated for speedy deletion as a test page. It's difficult to assess what the creator of the page intended, but it's unambiguously clear that it was not for any purpose to do with contributing to the encyclopaedia, and I have decided that some sort of editing test is likely, so I have accepted the speedy deletion nomination. JBW (talk) 14:11, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm almost certain that this "template" is just the History section of the enwiki Paypal page translated into Sinhala. I don't know why it needs to exist. -Biglittlehugesmall65 (Look at me or Talk to me) 12:43, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Joe Wicks[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 17:17, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both links lead to the Joe Wicks article, seems redundant to have a navbox that does not navigate anywhere. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 12:10, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Carettochelyidae[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:30, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Info repeated in Template:Testudines. Template is not needed for such a small taxonomoic family. Lavalizard101 (talk) 01:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete No need for templates with repeated information. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:29, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment: While Template:Testudines is a genus list template and Template:Carettochelyidae is a species list template, 2/3 genera are monotypic with the only non-monotypic genus having no separate species articles, hence my nomination. Lavalizard101 (talk) 18:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ari's talking place[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 16:30, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2 issues with this. 1: It isn't a template; 2: Wikipedia is not a place for you to talk to your friends. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:11, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Not suitable for Wikipedia. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 12:11, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is as blatant an attempt to use Wikipedia as a web host as I have ever seen. If it were in user space it would be speedily deleted under WP:CSD#U5, and I see no reason why the same shouldn't apply to other namespaces, but alas it doesn't. I have removed the unacceptable content from the page. JBW (talk) 14:21, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_June_17&oldid=1032214328"