Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 April 21

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< April 20 April 22 >

April 21[edit]

Template:Burmese Royal Family[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 April 29. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:48, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lao Royal Family[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 April 29. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:48, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Latest preview software release/KHTML[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Pmffl with the reason "orphaned - completely obsolete for KHTML" FASTILY 22:37, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2TeamBracket-2legs[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:04, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{2TeamBracket|legs=2|aggregate=yes}} Frietjes (talk) 15:29, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Expert review[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:08, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; created by a retired user; doesn't appear to have been used in any independent expert review process. Even if this was something we did, it should be a talk-page template. Elli (talk | contribs) 12:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, unused and no obvious use. We don't have a peer review process for this to be used in, and if at some point in the future you wanted to start expert peer reviewing articles making a template would be the easiest part of the process. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 22:19, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not currently used and unlikely to be used in the future unless a peer review system is put in place. Suonii180 (talk) 09:00, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is general value to marking versions of articles that have been peer reviewed, onwiki or otherwise. Our current mechanisms for that already exist on the talk page (article history). {{External peer review}} does exist so perhaps redirect to that template rather than a pure delete. (Delete is fine too.) --Izno (talk) 19:12, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • As a non-talk page template, Template:Academic peer reviewed also exists and probably needs to be 'dealt with' in some way, perhaps in a different nomination. Largely driven by now-departed editors. Last TFDd almost 3 years ago. (Huh, I was consistent then with now. Cool.) --Izno (talk) 19:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FromMeta[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:30, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused - do we actually do this anywhere? Any pages that have a master copy at meta, we use interwiki soft redirects (e.g. Wikipedia:Stewards). Elli (talk | contribs) 12:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete this started out as a single purpose template for Wikipedia:WikiProject template sharing which contained a clone of the page on meta. The meta page has been a redirect since 2008 and as the nominator states we use redirects rather than making duplicates of pages, as duplication leads to the pages diverging over time. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 22:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Australian Senators/asp[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:08, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These color templates were removed in December 2019 and are unused since. Gonnym (talk) 12:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kevin O'Leary series[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:08, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused bad navigation template, most of the links related to him go to sections - the others are tangential at best. Elli (talk | contribs) 12:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Non-free-vio[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:29, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused cleanup template - doesn't look like it ever was commonly used given the few places that link to it. Elli (talk | contribs) 12:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete It was used commonly in its day, but of course NF vios usually got fixed, so it got removed. These days we let people abuse NFCC at will, so it's rarely used. Black Kite (talk) 20:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Non-free FISU media[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:08, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused license tag - unnecessary specificity. Elli (talk | contribs) 12:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:North Dakota Radio Markets[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:08, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 October 20 § Template:North Dakota Radio Markets and Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 November 10 § Unused state Radio Markets templates for background information - not much of a reason to keep this anymore. Elli (talk | contribs) 12:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hazard[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:28, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No transclusions or links. No substantive edits since creation in 2007. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Future station bullet[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:28, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no links. No edits since creation in 2013. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:18, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Closed station bullet[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:27, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No transclusions. No edits since creation in 2014. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:03, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mathematician entry[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:27, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no links except one from a discussion page. No non-maintenance edits since 2007. A maintenance burden. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:44, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_April_21&oldid=1020519689"