Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 September 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 6[edit]

Template:Puerto Rico FC squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

no reason for a current squad template as the team is defunct Joeykai (talk) 22:23, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Botaş SK Squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

out-of-date, should be updated or deleted Frietjes (talk) 16:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canada Squad 2018 FIBA Women's Basketball World Cup[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. per this discussion and the prior discussions listed below Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:01, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

4th or lower place squad, see prior discussion Frietjes (talk) 14:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep First off, it's worth noting that this nomination hinges on something that happened three years ago and was far from a unanimous consensus. Second, I disagree with the fundamental claim made both in 2016 and here: I believe that participating in an international basketball competition, regardless of finish, is a defining characteristic of a basketball player pbp 15:12, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • so, how about a 2019 discussion: here? or related discussions here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, ... Frietjes (talk) 15:25, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Still stay keep; still believe keep is defensible with policy, won't be bludgeoned by previous discussions. Just because somebody else voted one way in a discussion doesn't mean I have to vote that way in this one. pbp 16:40, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Replacements of them are 2018 FIBA Women's Basketball World Cup squads, Basketball at the 1992 Summer Olympics – Men's team rosters, 2005 FIBA Africa Championship for Women squads. etc. Sawol (talk) 05:43, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per arguments described by WP:NAVBOXCREEP. Nothing particularly notable about a 12th place finish in a week long tournament. No compelling reason to include the entire roster for said tournament on each team member's Wikipedia article. BLAIXX 13:07, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Church of Antioch[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Patriarchates in Christianity. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:02, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Church of Antioch with Template:Patriarchates in Christianity.
Seemingly in effect redundant, duplicate content. PPEMES (talk) 14:21, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kaalia[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This seems out of the norm for Wikipedia, I don't believe that we generally have templates for single movies (ie. non-franchises) like this. This is all just rehashed content from the article. Praxidicae (talk) 11:46, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete per nom, the only substantial navigation here are the cast links, and we don't create navboxes for a single movie. Frietjes (talk) 14:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Actors should not be placed in navigational templates like this, so that leaves two links: the film article and a song article that are already well connected to each other, making this template unnecessary. Aspects (talk) 01:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).