Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 May 10

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 9 May 11 >

May 10[edit]

Iran Pro League table templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 00:17, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged (with attribution) with the parent article per consensus at WT:FOOTY. Frietjes (talk) 22:08, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 16:27, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Donna Haraway[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:58, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links to warrant a navbox. WP:NENAN --woodensuperman 08:32, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. User:Woodensuperman substantially re-scoped the template, which previously included information about institutional and personal affiliations, which is common for templates about other authors with multiple works that have their own pages. It was modeled on Template:Bruno Latour, which has never been proposed for deletion to my knowledge. Especially if the template is reverted to its previous state, there are plenty of links for a navbox. - - mathmitch7 (talk/contribs) 15:46, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The institutional and personal affiliations are way too tangential for inclusion (she did not invent Ecofeminism or Feminist theory, for example), and the template is, quite rightly not transcluded on any of those pages. Therefore it only provides navigation between three articles. --woodensuperman 15:52, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Although I disagree that they are "too tangential to be included," that's a discussion to be had on that template's talk page. Even if the final consensus form of this template has only three links (which I doubt it will), I do not believe that that would be reason to delete the template per my reading of WP:TFD#REASONS and WP:NAV - - mathmitch7 (talk/contribs) 16:02, 10 May 2019 (UTC).[reply]
  • delete, the bidirectional linking shows 3 articles, which can be connected using see also sections where required. Frietjes (talk) 22:53, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the "other" links in the template have almost nothing to do with Donna Haraway and vastly outnumber the valid links. It's ok to include a few "related" links to a large template, but when the related are almost the entire template then that template is broken. --Gonnym (talk) 10:43, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Topic series doc[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 20. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:26, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bossier City, Louisiana Mayors[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:56, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Several of the pages have already been deleted at AFD. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 01:54, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete if the articles are deleted, and keep if the articles are kept. Frietjes (talk) 22:54, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Bossier's not large enough for mayors to be presumptively notable. SportingFlyer T·C 04:20, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The active links are drowning in a sea of unlinked text, which makes navigation between the articles difficult. --woodensuperman 14:36, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Revised Minden, Louisiana Mayors[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Same reason as the Pineville navbox: most of the articles listed have been deleted at AFD. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 01:39, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete if the articles are deleted, and keep if the articles are kept. Frietjes (talk) 22:54, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete most corresponding articles have been deleted. Best, GPL93 (talk) 23:09, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The active links are drowning in a sea of unlinked text, which makes navigation between the articles difficult. --woodensuperman 14:36, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • After removing all the non-link text from the template, the template has 8 mayor links. Seems to be sufficient for a template. --Gonnym (talk) 21:22, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_May_10&oldid=898324702"