Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 January 30

< January 29	January 31 >

January 30[edit]

Template:Wyg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wyg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Gg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused; not clear where this would be used Frietjes (talk) 21:24, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jt[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jt (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused; not clear where this is needed Frietjes (talk) 21:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nj[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nj (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Nj1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Nj2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Nj3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Np1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Np2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Np3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:KLevelColor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:KLink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused; labelled "for personal use"; should be moved to userspace or deleted Frietjes (talk) 21:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Boston Breakers squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 03:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Boston Breakers squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

club has ceased operations so we don't need a "current squad" template Joeykai (talk) 18:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support ~~(in seven days time)~~. I updated the player articles that had this template transcluded, so it is officially no longer in use.Hmlarson (talk) 05:18, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 05:52, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support - defunct club does not have a 'current' squad and does not need such a template. Giant Snowman 12:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Carlos Moreno[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 03:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Carlos Moreno (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not the primary creator. See WP:FILMNAV. --wooden superman 15:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not a primary creator, and the articles are already linked by other templates like Template:Televisa telenovelas 2010s. Frietjes (talk) 14:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Juan Osorio[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 03:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Juan Osorio (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not the primary creator of the works in question. See WP:FILMNAV --wooden superman 15:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not a primary creator. Frietjes (talk) 14:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).