Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 18

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< October 17 October 19 >

October 18[edit]

Template:PD-Kiribati[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused license tag, and likely misrepresentation of consensus FASTILY 22:19, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ABL roster footer[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and there is no Template:ABL roster header and it's not clear why we would need to fork Template:Basketball roster header Frietjes (talk) 21:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:A-LeaguePreSeasonCup2006Finals[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates the bracket already found in 2006 A-League Pre-Season Challenge Cup#Pre-Season Cup finals series Frietjes (talk) 21:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:32TeamBracket-Conferences[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused fork of Template:32TeamBracket; not clear why this one is needed or where it would be used. Frietjes (talk) 21:19, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

CBA standings, playoffs, and relegations[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:17, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, duplicates 1997–98 CBA season#Regular Season Standings, 1997–98 CBA season#Playoffs, 1997–98 CBA season#Relegations, ... 2000–01 CBA season#Regular Season Standings, 2000–01 CBA season#Playoffs, 2000–01 CBA season#Relegations, ... Frietjes (talk) 20:40, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gujarati writers[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 26. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User wikipedia/Administrator someday[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus wrong venue Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let's be honest - virtually nobody who has this userbox on their page ever becomes an administrator, at least until they remove it and concentrate on other things. I think we should just get rid of this to stop leading misguided newbies into assuming that they can somehow use this box and actually get the tools. The related page, Wikipedia:List of administrator hopefuls seems to be out of date and lists several actual admins including Ansh666 and Cyberpower678. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I thought this was useful for more or less the same purpose that it's being nominated for: it helps sieve out the hat collectors and those otherwise suitable editors who haven't been around long enough to figure out the contradictory expectations the community has of future admins. – Uanfala 19:19, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ritchie333 from "What not to propose for discussion here" at the top of WP:TFD: Userboxes should be listed at Miscellany for deletion, regardless of the namespace in which they reside. hence, this discussion should be closed as wrong venue. Frietjes (talk) 19:45, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Or you could just move the discussion there. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:50, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Subst[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 26. Primefac (talk) 02:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Urdu writers[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by RickinBaltimore (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

given the number of entries in Category:Urdu-language writers, this sort of thing is better covered by a list article and a category. otherwise, there is a problem deciding (1) who should be in the navbox, and/or (2) keeping the category and list article and navbox all in sync. Frietjes (talk) 14:01, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Too large a group to be navigated in this manner. --woodensuperman 15:19, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Eric Goldberg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 26. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 03:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chaebol[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 26. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 03:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_October_18&oldid=1073610589"