Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 November 19

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< November 18 November 20 >

November 19[edit]

Template:Valid SVG/doc[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:04, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blank documentation page GXXF T • C 00:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ACRClosed[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template, very-short template. GXXF T • C 23:28, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bahnstreckenabschnitt Stuttgart Hbf–Stuttgart-Zuffenhausen[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No objection to userfying (if someone cares to) or retaining in the template space (if this is transcluded somewhere). ~ Rob13Talk 10:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bahnstreckenabschnitt Stuttgart Hbf–Waiblingen[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No objection to userfying (if someone cares to) or retaining in the template space (if this is transcluded somewhere). ~ Rob13Talk 10:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Badminton at the 2014 Sukma Games[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Sphilbrick (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:00, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, most articles don't exist. ~ Rob13Talk 10:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BLPVio[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, and it's unclear where this would ever be used. On a talk page, usually a whole comment is reverted if necessary. On an article, we clearly shouldn't be placing something like this; we should just remove the violation. ~ Rob13Talk 10:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete per nom. I don't see why we need this either. Frietjes (talk) 15:56, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Old deprecated ArbCom open cases templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. These were deprecated back in 2012 or earlier and fully protected as they had no plans to reuse them in the future. I asked an Arb Clerk, and they still highly doubt these would ever be useful to the project. They were only preserved for page histories in the past, but it's questionable whether a broken open cases table would even affect page histories in a significant way, and we don't usually consider page histories when determining whether to delete/keep templates. ~ Rob13Talk 10:29, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, if anyone really wants them we can undelete them latter. Frietjes (talk) 15:56, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:South Korea men's football squad 2014 Asian Games[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete most and relist the four mentioned women's football templates. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:46, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete speedy: It is unnecessary due to being a non-Olympian multi-sport event. Like this entry.

And more similar templates must be deleted:

Template:South Korea women's football squad 2014 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Pakistan men's football squad 2014 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Iran Squad 2014 Asian Games Men's Volleyball (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Korea Men Basketball Squad 2014 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Korea Women Basketball Squad 2014 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Philippines Men Basketball Squad 2014 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Thailand men's football squad 2014 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Iran football squad 1974 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Hong Kong men's football squad 1990 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Hong Kong men's football squad 1994 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Hong Kong men's football squad 1998 Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Padania squad 2008 Viva World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (not notable)
Template:Canada women football squad 2003 Pan American Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Canada women football squad 2007 Pan American Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:United States men football squad 2007 Pan American Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:United States women football squad 2007 Pan American Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Argentina squad 1964 Taça das Nações (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 1960 Taça do Atlântico (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (friendly)
Template:Brazil squad 1976 Taça do Atlântico (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (friendly)
Template:Brazil squad 1995 Umbro Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (friendly)
Template:Brazil squad 1997 Tournoi de France (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (friendly)
Template:Uruguay squad 1980 Mundialito (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (friendly)
Template:Brazil squad 1980 Mundialito (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (friendly)

And all templates included in this and this categories. JackHoang (talk) 03:39, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, navbox creep. Frietjes (talk) 15:37, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep women's football squads from Pan American Games, South Korea women's football squad 2014 Asian Games. Hmlarson (talk) 00:18, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unnecessary navbox creep. These athletes aren't known for participation in these squads. It's a tiny portion of their career. ~ Rob13Talk 08:05, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Communities of Oak Ridges, Ontario[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 27 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:55, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Steel industry[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:01, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Steel industry with Template:Iron and steel production.
Hardly used and the currect format are not easy to expand. 2001:DA8:201:3512:BCE6:D095:55F1:36DE (talk) 13:27, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cocoa production[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:01, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Cocoa production with Template:Chocolate.
Only used in unrelated pages; use Chocolate template instead. 2001:DA8:201:3512:BCE6:D095:55F1:36DE (talk) 13:27, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cotton production[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:00, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Cotton production with Template:Cotton sidebar.
No need for a specific template for such number of article. 2001:DA8:201:3512:BCE6:D095:55F1:36DE (talk) 13:27, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • weak oppose, I see no overlap in the links, and it's not clear if there is a preference for the sidebar vs the navbox. Frietjes (talk) 15:54, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Shimane Maru class aircraft carrier[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates navigation found in Template:WWII Japanese ships Frietjes (talk) 15:39, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_November_19&oldid=1073609732"