Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 February 12

< February 11	February 13 >

February 12[edit]

Template:Election result AU begin[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:21, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Election result AU begin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Election result AU (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, whereas the {{Election box begin}} system is used. Frietjes (talk) 21:17, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Kingdom of Hungary[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:47, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Kingdom of Hungary (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant template. The parent project was deleted a few days ago: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Kingdom of Hungary. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 16:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete Could have been G8 speedy tagged though. -- WOSlinker (talk) 20:09, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I forgot about WP:G8, and this does fit. I have no objection to this being speedied. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Placed of Snow Lotus Herb[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:28, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Placed of Snow Lotus Herb (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unclear what the author intents with this. Only linked from an almost unreadable article. The Banner talk 17:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually this template only just let reader know where are this kind of plant distribution, not for detail specific place or garden for planting. For the Template:Herb of Snow Lian Hua, please help me to delete it, i not really prefer the title and wish to change so hurry delete this template. So consider Template:Placed of Snow Lotus Herb really need to delete or not, i believe many of people don't know where of this plant species distribution area in country. At least people know these place got distribution for this kind of plant species. K.b.cheng (talk) 00:16, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, this information belongs in the main article text, not in a navbox. Frietjes (talk) 16:46, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have any command for this template to do submit deletion, depend with administrator. K.b.cheng (talk) 18:17, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not in keeping with standard use of navbox.--GrapedApe (talk) 23:44, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sky Sailing[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, after adding the single album link to Template:Owl City Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:27, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sky Sailing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Textbook WP:NENAN, links only one article. No chance of expansion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:00, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Currently four articles, not one, and we don't know if it will expand or not. It depends on whether the primary artist behind the project decides to continue using the title. Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
We don't need per-"project" navboxes for this. Each of these "project" navboxes should be merged to a template:Adam Young, ideally formed by moving the existing {{Owl City}} and then importing the Sky Sailing stuff into it. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
merge with Template:Owl City and delete. Frietjes (talk) 00:01, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Associated New American Colleges[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:20, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Associated New American Colleges (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox for members of Associated New American Colleges, a non-notable college group.--GrapedApe (talk) 03:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 16:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.