Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 October 25

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 25[edit]

Template:Infobox Old Mexican Cabinet without Vice President (1824-1880)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:40, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Old Mexican Cabinet without Vice President (1824-1880) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

option has been added to suppress the VP field in Infobox Old Mexican Cabinet with Vice President (1824-1880), so this template is now redundant. Frietjes (talk) 22:27, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2010-11 Perth Wildcats roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2010-11 Perth Wildcats roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

old and unused. Frietjes (talk) 20:52, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ISL roster header[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:43, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ISL roster header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:ISL roster footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 20:43, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FEB roster header[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:43, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FEB roster header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:FEB roster footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and out of date. Frietjes (talk) 19:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Hapoel Jerusalem[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:45, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hapoel Jerusalem (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and confusing, since Hapoel Jerusalem is more than one sport. Frietjes (talk) 18:57, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Baloncesto León[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:45, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Baloncesto León (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

defunct, so no current roster. Frietjes (talk) 18:56, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2009 Chicago White Sox season game log[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:48, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2009 Chicago White Sox season game log (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 18:47, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2008 Uni-President 7-Eleven Lions Season Game Log[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:48, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2008 Uni-President 7-Eleven Lions Season Game Log (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 18:38, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Patience Game[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge--Salix (talk): 08:37, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Patience Game (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Is there any point to having this? This looks redundant to Template:Infobox card game. There are some parameters here that aren't in Template:Infobox card game, but those look like parameters that ought to be added to Infobox card game anyway. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 16:32, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Non-free DVD cover[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Redirect. Salix (talk): 08:20, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Non-free DVD cover (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Non-free video cover}} Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:07, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CUSD[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:48, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CUSD (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Previous AFD on all the schools was decided as keep. this is not the standard we use now for elementary and middle schools. Unless someone can pull a rabbit out of a hat and prove that all these schools are notable (i turned them into redirects based on AFD outcomes on such schools), this template serves no purpose. (i know, wont someone think of the children?:) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:56, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete. if these were high schools, then we should expand the articles, but not for middle and elementary schools. Frietjes (talk) 18:27, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.