Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 December 2

< December 1	December 3 >

December 2[edit]

Template:Rating-5[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:21, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rating-5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated since November 2007 in favor of {{Rating}}. Fewer than 50 transclusions remaining as of this posting, which should all be replaced by the time this discussion closes. RL0919 (talk) 20:19, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you could tell me (on my talk page) what to replace it with? I wanted to do this a long time ago. Debresser (talk) 22:17, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page as requested. I should probably note, however, that I've already replaced almost all of the transclusions myself. As of this writing, there are only three left. --RL0919 (talk) 23:26, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for leaving me at least something to do. Debresser (talk) 00:46, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:History of the Ming Dynasty[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:21, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History of the Ming Dynasty (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Given you can't go anywhere it lists as selections... well, this speak for itself by being just red links. ♪ daTheisen (talk) 18:36, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I note that this was just created on Nov 30, and on Dec 1 the editor who created it was blocked because of a matter not related to this template. So it may be that there is an intention to create the articles. Looking at History of the Ming Dynasty, it is certainly long enough to justify the creation of sub-articles such as those redlinked in this template. --RL0919 (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yongle and his multiple socks are irrelevant to the fact that there are no articles for this template. Articles first, then template. Dougweller (talk) 15:45, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It seems clear at this point that the person who created the template won't be creating the articles, so in the absence of any other editor taking up the cause, there is no reason for this template to exist as just a series of redlinks. --RL0919 (talk) 19:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Brisbane Bullets[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 19:05, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Brisbane Bullets (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Current roster for a now defunct team. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:18, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and no longer relevant. --RL0919 (talk) 04:11, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Australian federal abolished divisions[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 19:05, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Australian federal abolished divisions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template, which appears to be redundant to a collection of Australian Federal templates (e.g., {{Australian federal NSW divisions}}) Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:13, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As the creator of this template I should have nominated it myself ages ago when it became obsolete. It is now covered in the individual state templates. Frickeg (talk) 01:47, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and unnecessary. --RL0919 (talk) 04:13, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:British Sport NGBs[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:32, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:British Sport NGBs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Old orphaned template, it's not clear if it's redundant to anything in particular, or if it is of any use? Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is redundant. The two included templates for Scotland and England are used independently, and there is {{BritSport}} for the UK-wide organizations. --RL0919 (talk) 04:17, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bayview Park link[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bayview Park link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Old, orphaned template. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused, and all it contains is three words of text wrapped in a font tag for color. --RL0919 (talk) 04:20, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bicon[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:30, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bicon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Old, orphaned template. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:59, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and apparently abandoned, with no talk and no meaningful edits since 2006. --RL0919 (talk) 04:23, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Azeri Tasks[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Azeri Tasks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Appears to be abandoned by Wikipedia:WikiProject_Azeri Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and no edits since it was created in 2006. The project appears to have its to-do list at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Azerbaijan/to do instead. --RL0919 (talk) 04:26, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ApprenticeUKWeekDetails[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:20, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ApprenticeUKWeekDetails (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Old, orphaned template. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:50, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and seemingly abandoned, with no talk and no edits since it was created in May 2008. --RL0919 (talk) 04:28, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:3he[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:19, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:3he (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template (see here for prior discussion). Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:41, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and redundant to simple markup tags. --RL0919 (talk) 04:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.