Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 123

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 120 Archive 121 Archive 122 Archive 123 Archive 124 Archive 125 → Archive 130

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jonathan Ball MBE.

If it is accepted that this article is more promotional than information, I need to edit it. I am happy to do this but request it be placed back for my review and edit. I have to say though Anthony Bradbury is wrong in concluding that because a legal case has a book attached it is more about the book. Intellectual Property Rights lawyers study Ball verus Eden and Ball versus Druces & Attlee and a book about the events surrounding the case, which takes only one paragraph of the entry on Jonathan Ball MBE is wholly informational.

thank you


Daniel Nanavati-Nanavati (talk) 14:37, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Not done. @Nanavati, Anthony Bradbury: Besides containing fairly promotional content (the text, not because of any legal case; e.g. "X has given a lifetime commitment to his local community beyond..."; neutral encyclopedic articles don't make proclamations like this), this was a blatant copyright infringement of jonathan-ball.com. Please note that copyright is not avoided by making minor cosmetic changes such as changing pronouns, as was done here, e.g., changing "I co-wrote the RNLI" to "Ball co-wrote the RNLI..." See Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Note that permission from the copyright owner to use his text is not what we would need for its use here (were it suitable for inclusion at all). For us to use someone's copyrighted text it must be released under a compatible free copyright license that allows anyone in the world to freely redistribute it even for commercial purposes (except, of course, for short quotes, marked as quotations). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for how release is obtained.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

shefacebook

Because this is the history of shefacebook and it does not violate any of the articles and not copied and codings. -Irufah (talk) 15:49, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

 Not done You've already re-created it ... and it still doesn't meet Wikipedia's requires for notability. Please stop promoting in this manner DP 16:08, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Gracie Barra Montreal

Please restore the page as I intend to keep on improving it. -MTK 14:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

- A first version of the page Gracie Barra Montreal (This is a Martial art school) was created by someone else some time ago. It was proposed for deletion for good reasons by this administrator PRehse: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PRehse .

- I noticed that the old page Gracie Barra Montreal was deleted by a second administrator (see old page log.)

- I rebuilt a new page from scratch after reading carefully the deletion archives and addressing one by one all the issues that were raised. In particular I paid special attention in proving notability with a significant number of independent and reliable references. PRehse followed this process in my sandbox with no problem.

- I recreated a new Gracie Barra Montreal page with the same title and a completely new content that addressed all the old issues.

- The new Gracie Barra Montreal page is reviewed and approved by an third administrator (see history of page).

- The new page is also approved and given a "Start class" by PRehse: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PRehse who, as a Martial artist, is in the best position to evaluate this Martial art content.

- A fourth editor (see log history) abruptly deleted the page the following day for, according to him "unambiguous advertisement".

- I contacted this fourth editor for more detailed explanation. I am however convinced that his action is indeed a mistake and I would prefere to be given a substantied warning and invited to improve the page.

- I, therefore, request that the Gracie Barra Montreal be restored and be given a chance to improve it further if indeed there is an issue that I missed.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mamadoutadioukone (talk • contribs) 14:36, 15 March 2014‎

You should communicate the above with the deleting administrator JamesBWatson (talk · contribs) before coming here. I left him a note on his talk page.
You re-created the article hours after it was deleted as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gracie Barra Montreal. However, it does appear to be a complete re-write, so wouldn't qualify for deletion under WP:CSD#G4. Then again, it does have a promotional tone, which might qualify it for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#G11 although it appears to me that the promotional content can easily be cleaned up. I am hesitant to override JamesBWatson's deletion decision until he comments here. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
There is always disagreement over the wording of CSD G4, with some people taking "sufficiently identical and unimproved" as meaning "almost identical", some taking it as meaning something closer to "sufficiently similar that the the arguments advanced in the existing AfD still applies". My own view is that, since the purpose of having this as a speedy deletion criterion is to avoid having to go through another AfD that essentially duplicates the previous one, the only logical interpretation of "sufficiently" is "sufficiently to make the existing AfD still apply. I also think that the article is sufficiently promotional to justify deletion for that reason, and a fairly brief search failed to produce evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Nevertheless, I have restored the article, on the basis of the assurance that the editor requesting restoration will "keep on improving it". I hope that it will indeed be improved enough to justify keeping it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
  • The article has now been speedily deleted again, by another administrator who appears to have a similar interpretation of CSD G4 to myself, as you can see here. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:45, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

online dating group video

we are using this page as an assignment in a new media class at SFU and we need it in order to obtain grades for this project. We will make it a private page we are still learning how to create such pages. -Cmnsgroup (talk) 00:07, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. Welcome to Wikipedia, but that is not suitable material for an article page in the main encyclopedia. What you need is a Wikipedia:Course page. Read Wikipedia:Student assignments for advice on how to set one up, and other useful advice about educational projects. Please ask your instructor to read that page, too. You will need to request a change of username, because group accounts are not permitted: more advice about that on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 12:19, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
In addition, it's impossible to make a page truly private on Wikipedia. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:38, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Meatspace Chat Screenshot.jpg

I created this image, licensed it appropriately and posted it here - there was no reason to delete it. -Daniel Smith (talk) 00:56, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. This was deleted as a result of Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 February 28#File:Meatspace Chat Screenshot.jpg. Please talk to the deleting admin, Ronhjones (talk). See also WP:Screenshot. JohnCD (talk) 10:18, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ezra Bayda

I, Binkydarling, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Binkydarling (talk) 01:04, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:38, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Performance Technologies Inc

This page is included in a student education project, and the course page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Uttsinghuajoint2014/Course_Page .Since it was deleted for Expired PROD, I sincerely request for undeletion, so I can improve it. Thanks a lot! -Kekoukele (talk) 07:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

jazwood

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -80.227.121.210 (talk) 06:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello,

Please undelete the term 'Jazwood'. See below. Industry players like Samsung and others in the MENA region are using this term 'Jazwood' to refer to Arabic movies an entertainment. See link: http://www.qatar-tribune.com/viewnews.aspx?n=D7E86F3B-5CC8-4463-B595-2ACC138BFFF6&d=20130718

Thanks, Nauman Arshad CSO - icflix.

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The article may still be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate, lasting normally seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The issue is whether this term is in sufficiently general use to meet the Wikipedia:Notability requirement of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
See also WP:NEO: "Articles on neologisms are commonly deleted, as these articles are often created in an attempt to use Wikipedia to increase usage of the term... To support an article about a particular term or concept, we must cite what reliable secondary sources, such as books and papers, say about the term or concept, not books and papers that use the term." JohnCD (talk) 10:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

fitnessonfire

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Fitnessonfire (talk) 11:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC)


The article has written from third neutral source and providing very minimal information I would like to dispute that article has a promotional nature! It's in similar style with other yoga business or yoga companies published by Wikipedia!

  •  Not done The 100% spammy userpage was deleted twice. There's an identical AFC. We do NOT promote any businesses - if there's an article about another non-notable business, please point it out so that we can delete it too. DP 12:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Successful Business Dealings & Management with China Oil, Gas and Chemicals Giants

I, Hpcn8888, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hpcn8888 06:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. See WP:Your first article and WP:Notability (books) for advice. JohnCD (talk) 16:04, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Med Flory

A7'ed a couple of times; apparently nobody noticed he was on WP:MET, a list compiled from other encyclopedias. He just died, and his resume in jazz and television is as long as my arm (starting with his role in founding Supersax). Please undelete; sources (AMG, the Grove Dictionary of Jazz) abound. -Chubbles (talk) 06:18, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

checkY Userfied - I have restored the article to User:Chubbles/Med Flory where you can update it. Please check with user Dlohcierekim (talk), the deleting admin, before you restore it to the mainspace. I have only restored the useful part of the history: early revisions were copyvios, and one later version was a one-liner about him appearing in Perry Mason. JohnCD (talk) 11:06, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Eh, you're right - not much to work from, there. I'm starting from scratch instead. Thanks for your help - Chubbles (talk) 18:18, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Jeffrey-skitch-pinafore.jpg

OTRS permission received - Ticket:2014030810006484. File appears to be PD, as author is unknown, and it was taken before 1964. ---Mdann52talk to me! 13:28, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Done. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phocas Software

I, Sn4ppyt0m, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sn4ppyt0m (talk) 12:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Cal Steele

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Night21Stalker (talk) 22:06, 17 March 2014 (UTC) Why Has My Page 'Cal Steele' Been Deleted!!!!??????? WHYYYY WHYYYY Whats wrong with the page. Can You Please Put It Back... I was trying to create a page for myself Which is honest and true...

It was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7. Bottom line, you need to be notable (by Wikipedia's definition of having significant coverage in multiple reliable sources independent of you), or in your case, you need to meet the criteria in WP:NFOOTY (actually played in a professional capacity on a pro team in a pro league). ~Amatulić (talk) 22:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

WeWOOD

I, 75.82.243.227, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 75.82.243.227 (talk) 21:18, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Would like to edit and resubmit article with more references and information -75.82.243.227 (talk) 21:20, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:50, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

FastestLaps

I added an article about FastestLaps because there is an article about GMInsideNews on Wikipedia. Neither of those fansites are my own, nor my friends', nor my family's, nor created by anyone I know. I wasn't adding the article for commercial purposes. Joe London (talk) 18:09, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

  • Please repair your request - we cannot process malformed requests. Please use the code {{subst:refund|pageName|reasoning}} (replacing pagename with the name of the page you wish to have restored and reasoning with the reason for your request).. Before you do that, however, read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS ES&L 11:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Earwig Music Company

The page was speedied while I was banned from wikipedia, so I could not contest (And I don't see I was notified of deletion either). Why the label covered even the Encyclopedia of the blues was deemed nonnotable, beats me. But anyway, it is bygones. Now I am requiesting to restore the article history, since I am sure my text has some other facts, absent in the recreated one. - Altenmann >t 00:20, 17 March 2014 (UTC) -- Altenmann >t 00:20, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. Articles deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 don't qualify for undeletion requests on this page. Please make your request to the deleting admin RHaworth (talk · contribs). ~Amatulić (talk) 01:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
    • WRONG. My text was deleted as "expired PROD", so this is exactly the page I need. - Altenmann >t 01:27, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
And capital letters with bold is your way of asking a favour? Nice. DP 10:25, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
  • If you consider actions of admins as doing favors to other wikipedians, it is really sad, colleague. Care to explain why stressing key statements, to attract attention quickly, is bad? - Altenmann >t 15:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
It was deleted by PROD, but the complicated history shows that it was also later deleted five times by A7. However, no harm doing a history merge, so I have done it. JohnCD (talk) 10:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. I understand a possible confusion and I didn't care what was deleted after me. I only vouch for what I wrote. - Altenmann >t 15:49, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
There was no confusion. If it had been deleted 5 times as A7, I didn't care that the first deletion was a prod. In any event, I'm glad it's now straightened out. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Well, a stupid thing is that it is not the article I had in mind; I created so many useless articles I don't even remember. :-( - Altenmann >t 03:14, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ManPACK

I, Tweedie2013, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tweedie2013 (talk) 18:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:19, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Phunckateck Communications

All members of this collective are still active in the electronic music scene. This article is a historic part of the West Coast Drum & Bass music movement. Some individual members have their own Wikipage and others have contributed to works by other artists on Wikipedia. The reason for deletion appears to be "Non-notable subject with no sources. Looks autobiographical". Yet there are many notable achievements amongst the artists listed on the page. The page should be able undeleted so that the content may be edited and links to the appropriate articles and references can be included. Thank you for your consideration. -99.7.8.22 (talk) 23:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/66 DAYS ADRIFT

I would like to continue to work on this page in hopes it can be made acceptable. Thank you. Bill Butler BillButler99 (talk) 01:18, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:26, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wilson Gault Somers

I, Deployedgillaspy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Deployedgillaspy (talk) 02:11, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:27, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Wilson Gault Somers

I now have additional information on his accomplishments, and additional citations for information previously posted. -Deployedgillaspy (talk) 02:16, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

  •  Not done does not exist, see AFC page above. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:28, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Megaventory

I, 188.4.176.215, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 188.4.176.215 (talk) 10:39, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

So I can keep a backup copy, edit offline and resubmit at a later time -188.4.176.215 (talk) 10:41, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:42, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Arun Vinayak

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Arun vinayak (talk) 11:34, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

 Not done - there is nothing there worth restoring, only the words "Arun Vinayak an Network engineer". Wikipedia is not a place like LinkedIn or Facebook for people to write about themselves; that is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 18:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brittany Lee

I, Jtshannoniii, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jtshannoniii (talk) 14:29, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:53, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dag Arne Osvik

I, Ronkeobajimi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Article was not edited for a long time, we are now ready to submit the article for approval. AlpCode 16:14, 18 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronkeobajimi (talk • contribs) 16:14, 18 March 2014‎

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review; please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read Wikipedia:Your first article for advice. JohnCD (talk) 18:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/echogravity

This was requested by Echogravity (talk · contribs), but the request was malformed. I am merely restoring it on their behalf and have no opinion one way or another on the merits of the request. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:39, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Not done. There isn't anything worth restoring. It's just a 2-line blatant advertisement for the company. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:40, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mimi Candy

I, Capceng, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Capceng (talk) 22:26, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Not done, because the article is purely promotional and would need a complete re-write from scratch to bring it to acceptable standards. I suggest you re-write it from scratch. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:45, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shine Like Stars

I, Hayler97, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hayler97 (talk) 22:08, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Done, but bear in mind that the article will likely not be accepted unless you can prove the band meets any of the inclusion criteria specified in WP:BAND. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:47, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tornado heavy metal band

I, MrTom65, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MrTom65 (talk) 19:43, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Done, but see WP:BAND for acceptance criteria. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Diva (Korean Group)

{{subst:refund|1= Diva (Korean Group) |2= This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... wikipedia does not have any information about this popular girl group in Korea, their albums, members and activities. Please do not let it deleted because I am just sharing my information about this band. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dah Steen (talk • contribs) 02:39, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:45, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Potapov Vladimir artist

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Potapovw (talk) 08:39, 19 March 2014 (UTC) Good day Please do not delete this page, because it has importance for the representation of Russian contemporary art in particular painting. Vladimir Potapov actively engaged in painting as an artist and as a curator, he attends international conferences on contemporary painting (last here this http://www.nasjonalmuseet.no/An+Appetite+for+Painting.b7C_wlHMZp.ips). Thank you.

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. Please also see WP:Autobiography. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 09:33, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Veerendra Senar (2)

please un deletion this article, an real person article , who are you delete this article, so i requist to admistratative -Mahesh1985 (talk) 04:31, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. The fact that it's a real person is irrelevant; see WP:Notability. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:46, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
It is not enough to be a real person, see WP:CREATIVE for the notability requirements to have a Wikipedia article. An assistant director is very unlikely to qualify, yet; the time for an article will be after he has directed several mainstream films of his own. Since you wrote "i know this person, we have personally attachment", you have a WP:Conflict of interest and should not be writing about him anyway. JohnCD (talk) 09:51, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Ravishankar Thakur

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Rajarajeswar (talk) 06:00, 19 March 2014 (UTC) Mistakenly I have deleted this page please recover it.

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. Also, only administrators can delete pages. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:09, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
Wikipedia is a project to build an encyclopedia. It is not a social-networking site for people to write about themselves and their friends. JohnCD (talk) 10:53, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Printech Global

I think the page met all the requirements and if there are changes to be made I will make them.. Please restore the page -Mnyika91 (talk) 14:22, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done. Not only was it deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7, which disqualifies it from being undeleted by request on this page, but it was also deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#G11 (unambiguous promotion) and WP:CSD#G12 (copyright infringement). Absolutely no way this will be restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:36, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_Goldberg

The articel was deleted because the person is not 'significant' according to Wikipedia. I did not know that this was a criteria, and thus did not know it would be deleted, and there is some info that I placed on the page that I did not save elsewhere and would like to get it before the page is permanently deleted for my own personal use -Photo.iep (talk) 15:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. The test for inclusion in Wikipedia is called WP:Notability, see also WP:Notability (people). That article looked like something for a social-networking site, not an encyclopedia. So I will not restore it, but I will email you a copy if you enable email on your account. To do that, click on "Preferences" at the top of the screen, and then near the bottom of the "User profile" tab fill in your email address (which will not be visible to me or anybody) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users". JohnCD (talk) 18:06, 19 March 2014 (UTC)


The Himanshu Purohit

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -115.241.154.80 (talk) 11:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
Wikipedia is not a social-networking site for people to write about themselves or post their CVs. JohnCD (talk) 18:53, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Scout Association of Malta.png

miscapping zealot broke the hyperlink so it showed as not used in article -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:02, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

 Done JohnCD (talk) 19:03, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Hometaurus Market Place

Hometaurus Market Place

The page is conversant with wiki guidelines and I wish to work on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mnyika91 (talk • contribs) 14:35, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Not done. No, it wasn't "conversant with wiki guidelines". It was moved to Printech Global, which was deleted for several reasons, see the section above. I suggest you try submitting articles through Wikipedia:Articles for creation instead of submitting them directly to main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:41, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Scouts of Karelia.svg

due to new developments about 3 weeks ago, this emblem has been resurrected and is needed again -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Not done. What is that supposed to mean? It was deleted because it violated the Wikipedia:Non-free content policy. You have given no indication that anything has changed. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:47, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

File:All-Russian National Scouting Organization.svg

due to new developments about 3 weeks ago, this emblem has been resurrected and is needed again -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:14, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Not done. Please don't be vague. What "new developments"? "Needed again" for what? What exactly has changed that would prevent this image from violating the Wikipedia:Non-free content policy, which is why it was deleted in the first place? ~Amatulić (talk) 20:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/T. H. Cayne

I, Artcollectorgirl, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Artcollectorgirl (talk) 12:23, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Done. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:51, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adam J. Yeend

I, 64.183.102.98, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 64.183.102.98 (talk) 16:34, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Done. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:53, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

CodeNarc

So I can attempt to edit and improve -Cmair (talk) 00:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

  •  Not done The article never existed - see above for AFC submission restoration DP 08:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maison SONG

Please restore this draft as deleted under G13 Nguyenbaot (talk) 08:41, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. DP 09:01, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cmair/CodeNarc

I, Cmair, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cmair (talk) 00:28, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. DP 09:03, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jeremy Zafran

I, JZafran, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ''You Never Know Until You've Tried It." (talk) 21:54, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Mike Reilly (ice hockey)

Please restore edit history for this recently recreated article. -Dolovis (talk) 22:11, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Wave Walkers

First cancer survivors' dragon boat team in London, UK. -RagingEddy (talk) 12:00, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion a7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user DGG (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:07, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Sylvan Heights Bird Park

Enter your I was not finished with editing the article. here and then click the "Save page" button below -SylvanHeights (talk) 15:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Not done. No article by that name has ever existed, either in main space or at WP:AFC. You created it on your user page, but there is no way we'll un-delete that, because promoting your organization is not what user pages are for. Also, you need to change your username to something that represents only you. See WP:CHU/Simple for that. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:13, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rescue Remedies Dog Rescue

I, Wander Woman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wander Woman (talk) 14:57, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Done. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

pressat

Please restore the page as I intend to work on it and add more references of notability. "Save page" button below -Lobas (talk) 20:26, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:17, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Not possible says blacklisted which is strange. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lobas (talk • contribs) 22:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

What is blacklisted?
Well, since the deletion debate was sparsely attended (only one comment)....
Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Lobas/Pressat. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Mark Arsten (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:26, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

mobsta stellz

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -DATDUDEaDon (talk) 22:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC) mobsta stellz

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion a7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Deb (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:43, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kendra Dixson (Smith)

I, 96.50.181.209, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 96.50.181.209 (talk) 19:28, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Done. Let me advise you that I doubt that she will pass the elevant notability standard WP:CREATIVE, unless her work is in the permanent collections of major museums. You will also need to rewrite the article without adjectives of praise, and use her last name to refer to her--referring to her as "Kendra" in the article is unprofessional for anyone other than a performing artist; it is a trick often done by the writers of press releases, and has no place in an encyclopedia. DGG ( talk ) 04:32, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vegas Weddings

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 68.108.117.222 (talk) 01:18, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

 Comment: Title was recreated with comments from contributor. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 04:43, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Done The submission page wasn't the place to put your plea for undeletion, but never mind: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, I have restored the deleted version. This page has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice. JohnCD (talk) 09:18, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

In Our Translated World

This a new book published by The Tamil Literary Garden with support from thE Trillium Foundation, Ontario. This is a unique book of its kind that has Tamil Poems and their English translation next to each other. The page was deleted by another editor while it was being edited -Mohan.subramanyan (talk) 23:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. A3s also cannot be contested here, as they're not viable encyclopedia articles. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 23:59, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 Not done. I have deleted this page as a copyright violation. Wikipedia cannot accept copied material without a formal copyright release; in any case, just copying the publisher's blurb does not make an acceptable encyclopedia article. See WP:Notability (books) for the relevant notability standard. JohnCD (talk) 09:28, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Amy Devers

I, Maddancer5, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Maddancer5 (talk) 03:19, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:44, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Japanese Invasion of Batan Island

Ok, first off, sorry if it's against the rules or something to undo what you typed here, but when I tried to re-edit this last time, it didn't save. I didn't explain myself very well. The person who flagged my article for speedy deletion (reddogsix) accidentally mistook it for the Battle of Bataan. My article is about Batan Island, a different island invasion in the Philippines that took place a month earlier.

Batan Island is a separate island, but is still part of the Philippines. The invasion of Batan Island took place a month prior to that of Bataan, and kicked off the Japanese invasion of the Philippines. It is also listed in the first sentence on the following link, off of the Philippines Campaign link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippines_Campaign_(1941%E2%80%9342)#Initial_landings, and is in the upper right-hand corner of the map on that page. Thank you,

Cnd474747 (talk) 03:21, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Cnd474747

 Done. @RHaworth: it seems A10 was a misunderstanding. JohnCD (talk) 10:11, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Template Lifetime

Together with tl BD. It is a highly useful template no semiautomate page categorization. The deletion was grossly misunderstanding. Now I have to manuallty type lots of text, which was previously filled in by the bot: I typed BD|1921|1898|Zimmer, Alfred, and the bot added DEFAULTSORT and categories. How I have to waste 2 minutes for this . - Altenmann >t 01:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

  • P.S. I guess the deleters were confused of the template use, because it does not live long in pages, being quickly replaced by a bot. -- Altenmann >t 01:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 March 1#Template:Lifetime, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Plastikspork (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Well why you were answering here I undeleted this as a soft delete, it was unsupported. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:42, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
No worries! JohnCD (talk) 10:54, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Do you know that subst:L is faster than entering lifetime and then expecting bots to fix it? -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Document Acts

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Phismith (talk) 18:04, 16 March 2014 (UTC) The article was deleted on the grounds of 'uncontroversial copyright violation' Parts of the article were indeed based on published material, but the copyright owner of both items mentioned in the justification for deletion was myself. I would be happy to provide permission for reuse if this is what is required, or to remove the copyrighted portions of text and replace them, as needed. In any case please if at all possible give me access to the text previously created, since many of the bibliographical items were not saved. With thanks Barry Smith (Redacted)

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G12. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. If it has been published anywhere else it is automatically fully-copyrighted unless explicitly stated otherwise, per the Berne Convention. I have also taken the liberty of redacting your email address - posting an email address on a site as widely viewed as Wikipedia is an invitation to be spammed. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:50, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 Not done. Copyright is a very serious issue for Wikipedia, and I am sure you will understand that we cannot restore copyrighted material, even temporarily, on the basis that someone on the end of a wire says it is OK. I will email the text to you if you enable email on your account. To do that, click on "Preferences" at the top of the screen, and at the bottom of the "User profile" tab enter your email address (which will not be visible to me or to spammers) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users".
The way to make a copyright release is described at WP:Donating copyrighted materials, but I have some doubts whether this material would be acceptable under the Wikipedia:No original research policy. More about that on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 23:11, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
I have enabled email on my account. Can you email the original? With thanks and with apologies for the trouble, Barry Smith — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phismith (talk • contribs) 20:15, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 Done - text emailed. JohnCD (talk) 10:58, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Mainframe (band)

This page provides useful and correct information about a music band that did actually exist in the time period and place described. They produced one album, one 12-inch EP and two singles. It is unfortunate to have lost this information from wikipedia. I cannot make a comment about the claims to notability, but these can be easily removed. Please can you restore this page? -118.210.48.30 (talk) 12:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Ritchie333 (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The article needs references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish that it meets the notability standard of WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk) 13:31, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/St Joseph's Private School

I, Francislimsj, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Francislimsj (talk) 13:44, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article and WP:SOAP for advice. At present, this reads like a prospectus, not an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not a place for the school to tell the world about itself. JohnCD (talk) 18:10, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Moffat & Williamson Ltd

There is nothing wrong with the page, a silly man keeps deleting it and swearing at me, discriminating me for having a disability -Danieljackwilliamson99 (talk) 19:20, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Not done. The article isn't deleted yet, but it soon will be, unless you assert some sort of notability for the subject. And your contribution history shows that the only one in this situation who is swearing, is you.
When the article is deleted, it won't qualify for restoration by request on this page because it was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:37, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_123&oldid=1090623059"