What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.
Primary issues (added by the filing party)
the talk page section should be left open for comments/sources to reach consensus for improving the higgs boson article
If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.
The5thForce raises no specific issue, and proposes no specific changes to the article. WP:NOTFORUM applies. Mediation is pointless, but if someone wants to offer a 3rd opinion, they can certainly do that. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 21:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.
Reject. Fails to meet prerequisites for mediation numbers 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8, any one of which would be sufficient to reject the case. To challenge a closing decision, see here. For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 23:19, 3 February 2016 (UTC) (Chairperson)[reply]
