Wikipedia:Peer review/Trade and usage of saffron/archive1

Trade and usage of saffron[edit]

I created this because the main article Saffron was still 70 kb long. I hope this will help achieve summary-style there. Any comments (especially on the lead, which I know needs to be substantially reworked to suit the new subarticle) would be welcome. Saravask 23:23, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The "Usage" section followed immediately by the "Culinary" section with only the word [edit] inbetween leaves an odd blank area, especially with an image right below the "Culinary" heading. --maclean25 08:24, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~Hello. What do you recommend that I do about this? Are you suggesting a transitionary section of some kind? Thank you.~~ Saravask 20:29, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I tried removing the "Usage" heading and making "Culinary use", "Medicinal use", and "Colouring and perfumery" major headings. Also, I notice that neither (Deo 2003, p. 1), nor (Grigg 1974, p. 287) from "Notes" have made it into the reference section yet.--maclean25 10:10, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks — good eye. I added Grigg and Deo in. I noticed that you promoted subheadings in the "Usage" section and eliminated the superheading altogether. ~~What this meant to address your own previous comment?~~ Saravask 16:50, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've given this a copyedit to try and eliminate convoluted language. Saravask 18:37, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Overall an excellent, well-written and nicely formatted article, at least in my opinion. I couldn't find any other significant fixes that need to be made. I looks close to being ready for FA. — RJH 15:44, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]