Wikipedia:Peer review/Reparative therapy/archive1

I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to get it to FA status, and think I'm almost there.

Thanks,

Fireplace 03:18, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR _t 00:47, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is outstanding, at least A-class and probably a good candidate to be featured. All of the statements are backed up by references, and the general layout of the article seems logical and coherent. Ironically, in the course of trying to cover every detail, the article may have grown too long. It would be wise to look for redundancies and say once what is in some cases said two or more times. I saw a sentence in the 1939 to 1969 historical section about what reparative therapists tend to do; it seemed out of place and redundant with coverage elsewhere in the article. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 15:23, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]