Wikipedia:Peer review/Chennai Super Kings/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chennai Super Kings[edit]

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I am listing this for a PR because we (WikiProject Indian Premier League) want it to reach GA status. Thank you. Dipankan (Have a chat?) 10:18, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Dipankan (Have a chat?) 10:18, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See my comments at the Good article review. If you have any questions or want further input, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Harrias talk 10:53, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

  • Lead should be three paras, see WP:LEAD.
  • Consider restricting the table of contents to just the second heading level.
  • " as CSK[2])" put ref outside parenthesis.
  • "Mahendra Singh Dhoni [4] " don't have spaces between text and refs.
  • " Chennai right next to beach" this isn't grammatically correct in English. "the beach" would be better, but really, is it significant enough for the lead about the cricket team?
  • "Chennai Super Kings (CSK) is the most successful team" you've already abbreviated the team name.
  • Don't overlink IPL.
  • Check "singh" in the infobox for capitals.
  • 3-year -> three-year.
  • Lots of cricket jargon without linking, this will be inaccessible to normal readers.
  • Batting average, bowling average etc, all need links.
  • What does * mean?
  • Really, you need a non-cricket reader to look at this (I get it but others wouldn't, so keep the PR open until you get a non-cricket fan review!)
  • "skipper Dhoni's blistering innings" be careful not to become like a tabloid paper
  • Don't use bold for emphasis in the table per WP:BADEMPHASIS.
  • Dhoni's salary is referenced but where are all the other's?
  • Where is the player list referenced?
  • Fixtures and results section is unreferenced as well.
  • IPL season, check sorting, it doesn't work at all.
  • Tables with a "Total" row, that row should always be at the bottom despite sorting.
  • Make sure all references have as many fields as possible, as a minimum publisher, access date, title, author (where available), date of publication (where available) etc.

The Rambling Man (talk) 19:22, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]