Wikipedia:Peer review/Bughouse chess/archive1

Bughouse chess[edit]

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get it up to FA standard. I previously nominated it for FA, see HERE, but the article didn't make it. I think most of the concerns were addressed but I am looking for any comments that can improve the article. Especially the FA 1a criterion ((a) "Well written" means that the prose is engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard.) might be an issue.

Thanks a lot for any help you can provide, Voorlandt 06:46, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.^[?]
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, DTGardner 21:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]